As
I anticipated, there is clearest
possible evidence that the page
covering that event has been
removed and retyped on the same
typewriter but by a different
typist..
-- David
Irving, reading the British
Second Army's record of Himmler's
death |
March
18, 2003 (Tuesday), London Up at 9:20 AM. I had written on January
8 to Duncan
Sandys Jr requesting access to the
late Lord Sandys' papers which are "open"
in the Churchill archives, in these
terms: "For my work on the third volume of
Churchill's life, I would like to consult
a file of correspondence between Mr Duncan
Sandys and Churchill 1944-1945, which is
in the Churchill College archives. The
file is already marked as open, but needs
your general consent, I believe.
There may also be other items falling in
this category which I would like to
consult. Duncan Sandys Sr provided
major assistance to me already in 1963
when I wrote the book The
Mare's Nest, about the German
V-weapons. I would be happy to send you a
complimentary copy of vol. ii if it would
interest you." Today, over two months later, he
e-mails me refusing! "The executors of Lord
Duncan-Sandys's estate have considered
your request for access to his papers
and have decided not to grant it on
this occasion." Apart from the Allen Dulles
papers at Princeton, many, many years ago,
this is the only occasion on which I have
been refused access to a collection of
papers in a public archive. I reply: "I am sure that the late
Duncan Sandys (Lord Sandys) would
strongly disapprove this decision. As
the executors may be aware from his
papers he gave me the greatest possible
assistance for my book The
Mare's Nest in 1967, which was
serialized by The Sunday
Telegraph and Der Spiegel.
He subsequently invited me to his
receptions and cocktail parties. On one
occasion he personally escorted me
round the then secret Underground War
Cabinet Rooms! However, the decision is
theirs and I shall ensure that it is
suitably highlighted in the
introduction to the third volume when
published." March
19, 2003 (Wednesday), London The German Federal Archives today
returned to me, at their own expense, the
David Irving Collection from the
Bundesarchiv, a big pallet of boxes. We
have to pay £200 Customs charges. My
boxes of papers have returned after ten
years. On July 3, 1993, the day they
banned me from the archives building in
Koblenz "in the interests of the German
people," they had to undertake to return
to me the half-ton of historical documents
and papers I had collected and donated to
them over the previous thirty years. In
the evening I settle down to scrutinise
the diary of the British Second Army
Defence Company for May 1945, covering the
arrest and alleged suicide of Heinrich
Himmler. As I anticipated, there
is the clearest possible evidence that the
page covering that event has been
removed and retyped on the same
typewriter but by a different typist. Remarkable that nobody else has spotted
that (just as none of the conformist
historians ever spotted that two of the
most incriminating pages of Himmler's
famous speeches at Posen in October 1943
and in May 1944 had been removed and
retyped by another hand). What can that mean? Well, there are no
entries between May 20 and May 23, 1945,
the date of Himmler's mysterious death;
and since other sources indicate clearly
that Himmler's arrest was May 21, not May
23 as later claimed, it may mask what was
happening to him on the missing two
days. Image
above: David
Irving in the British public archives,
March 2003 March
20, 2003 (Thursday), London Lawyer Peter Laskey informs me
at 10:32 AM: Penguin Books Ltd and
Deborah Lipstadt: I have this
morning received notification from the
Civil Appeals Office that the
permission application has been
refused by Dyson LJ
[Lord Justice]. . . Counsel Adrian Davies says this
refusal is monstrous, as the law is quite
plain. As before, I am entitled to apply
in open court for this negative decision
to be overturned, and I shall. We have
seven days to give notice of this, and it
is good that I signed 2,300 letters to my
transatlantic supporters last week, as we
are going to need every penny for these
last yards of this final mile. Television news coverage this evening
shows "Iraqi prisoners" surrendering to a
British soldier: two prisoners come toward
the Tommy; while they are still some
distance away he shouts at them in
English, "Drop to your knees" (They
comply). "Turn round and face the other
way." (They comply). Amazing, how many
Iraqi peasants have a fluent understanding
of English, and spoken in a northern
British accent which even I sometimes
can't understand. The BBC cautiously
states that the film has been supplied by
the Ministry of Defence. Needless to say our brainless TV
commentators don't ask the obvious
questions. But the television coverage
also throws up other baffling phenomena:
the bombing of Baghdad, vivid and
criminal, is spectacular, literally a
gigantic fireworks display. Military
gentlemen to whom I talk agree with me
that the weapons appear to have been
loaded with chemical combinations designed
to produce maximum flash, and large, oily
mushroom clouds -- the kind of expertise
that special effects men in Hollywood are
well known for. The bombload are designed
in other words for their televisual
effect. The daylight brings confirmation
confirms that actual damage to the big
buildings is relatively modest, with
individual rooms of ministerial buildings
taken out, but nothing like the
devastation that the RAF's big 4,000- and
8,000-pound "blockbusters" of WW2 caused
in Berlin. Incidentally, we repeatedly see the
flash of the missiles detonating three
miles away, and we hear the simultaneous
sound effect. Uh, shouldn't the wallop
take about fifteen seconds to travel to
the camera's microphone? I am mildly
baffled by that one. March
22, 2003 (Saturday), London Big
anti-war demonstration down marches
Piccadilly this afternoon. I walk with
Jessica down Down Street and take a
couple of pictures of the huge throng,
from next to the defunct Tube station; but
there are isolated shouts of "It's Irving.
Nazi Scum!" and we make a dignified return
to the abode. It seems that that Far Left
have captured control of what was in
February a genuine middle-English protest
movement. In the evening, Jessica, 9, crowns a
day of perfect behaviour by deciding on
her own initiative to write a letter to
president George Bush, telling him
to stop the war against Iraq, and saying
she cannot stand the screams of the
children who are being bombed. A real
angel. She even adds words of criticism
for B-Liar (Tony Blair). Loud
chuckles from Benté, as she reads
it, and much pride from me, and I persuade
Jessica to make a Xerox before it vanishes
into its envelope. I dictate the 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
address to Jessica ('What is the correct
Zip code?' she asks), and she puts a
picture of the London anti-war
demonstration into the envelope too, for
the President's edification. I tell her that many years ago
Josephine, may God rest her soul,
wrote as a child to President
Reagan to protest at the poor quality
of American TV programmes flooding onto
British screens. [Previous
Radical's Diary] |