| Warren
Kinsella
complains about our Website: Without
Prejudice Thursday, February 25, 1999 Dear Sirs: I am Warren
Kinsella, and the person referred to on
your web site, "David
Irving's Action Report." On that web site, you make numerous statements
about me which are false, malicious and defamatory.
In particular, you headline one item with an
assertion that I "libelled" an individual and "paid
for it." As you are perhaps aware, the
determination that I libelled the person in
question could only be made by a court. Given that
the action in question
never made it to trial, this allegation made by you
is false and harmful to my reputation. Moreover,
your statement that I, Warren Kinsella,
"paid" for this "libel" is also false and
defamatory. I have not paid any damages, or any
other amount, whatsoever to the individual in
question. Additionally, you have posted on your web site a
letter by Douglas
Collins that is wildly defamatory of me, and
which divulges information relating to the
above-noted action which the plaintiff and his
counsel had undertaken to keep strictly
confidential. I therefore require that you provide
any information you possess relating to this breach
of contract. I look forward to your prompt response, or to
that of your solicitors. Yours very truly, Warren
Kinsella | David
Irving replies
(Thursday, February 25, 1999): To: WARREN KINSELLA of Suite 3800, 200 Bay
Street, South Tower, Royal Bank Plaza, Toronto,
Ontario, Canada, M5J 2J7 Key West, Florida, Thursday, February 25,
1999 Dear Mr Kinsella, I have received your message. Is it not true
that on July 20, 1998 your publisher HarperCollins
settled out of court a libel action arising from
your book Web of
Hate with a substantial payment, as
stated in the items on our FPP Website at this
URL: http://www.fpp.co.uk/Canada/CJC/CollinsonKinsella.htmland http://www.fpp.co.uk/Canada/CJC/Kinsella1.html If there is any substantive inaccuracy in the
above statement, or in either of these two items,
please establish to our satisfaction what the
correct text should be and we will make the
necessary emendations. This is an open letter. We have received a considerable response to our
Internet appeal for information on your career. Yours sincerely David
Irving FOCAL POINT PUBLICATIONS | Warren
Kinsella
responds, Thursday, February 25,
1999: Without
Prejudice Thursday, February 25, 1999 Dear Sirs: Neither my publisher, nor I, paid any damages
whatsoever to Mr. Rocan. Any sums paid to
bring the nuisance suit to a close were paid by my
publisher's insurer. Your web site remains factually inaccurate and
libelous. You are entitled to describe this
exchange as "open" but your solicitor will of
course remind you that any republication or
amplification of a libel merely increases the
damages to which a defendant is entitled. In addition, your response to my letter of
yesterday's date does not disclose the source of
the information whose publication amounts to a
breach of a settlement contract, and possibly a
breach of a solicitor's undertaking made by your
Mr. Christie. I therefore reiterate this
demand, and remind you that I have brought your
conduct to the attention of solicitors in
Britain. I expect to see the necessary modifications, and
responses, very shortly. I thank you for your
attention to this matter. Yours very truly, Warren
Kinsella | Note:
This matter is now closed. The information relied
upon was not of course provided to this
Website by Mr Douglas Christie, a Canadian
barrister of high integrity. More
on Kinsella
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
| Kinsella
Index | |
|