International Campaign for Real History since 1991

Quick navigation

Posted Tuesday, March 23, 2004

Mr Irving's solicitors express opposition to the "expert" nominated by Lipstadt's lawyers to assess the value of his archival collection, on the grounds of the expert's previous behaviour

FENWICK & CO

S O L I C I T O R S
55 HIGH HOLBORN, LONDON WC1V 6DT

Telephone 020s7269 9292 • Facsimile 020s7269 9299
DX 171, Chancery Lane • [email protected]

 

 

Tuesday, 23 March 2004

Our Ref: JGF/PAM/RHP/2545

Your Ref:

Messrs Mishcon de Reya
DX: 37954
Kingsway

Attention: Ms Laura Tyler

Dear Sirs,

Re: Irving v Penguin Books Limited and Lipstadt

We write further to your facsimile letter of even date.

We observe that despite our client's concerns, your client insists upon the continuing involvement of Mr [Tobias] Jersak who apart from the attempt to "remove certain documentation held in the Trustees' custody" [DLA's letter of 13th February 2004] on the occasion of his first visit, also left the Collection in a state of complete disarray. No doubt you will have put Mr Jersak and his colleague on strict notice of the conduct required.

Contrary to our earlier advice, Mr D++++ M++++ will now represent our client on 24th and 25th March. Consistent with your letter aforesaid, he will be in attendance at Regal House at 2.00pm tomorrow where he will liase with representatives also of the trustees and the insolvency agents.

Yours faithfully

FENWICK & CO

 

Our dossier: The fight over Mr Irving's seized possessions and archives
© Focal Point 2004 F DISmall write to David Irving