No. VANCOUVER
REGISTRY FEDERAL COURT OF
CANADA TRIAL DIVISIONBETWEEN: CANADIAN FREE SPEECH
LEAGUEAPPLICANT AND: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, IN THE RIGHT OF CANADA, and THE MINISTER OF EMPLOYMENT AND
IMMIGRATIONRESPONDENT NOTICE OF MOTIONTAKE NOTICE that the Plaintiff,
Canadian Free Speech League will make a
motion to the Court, pursuant to Rules, on
or before Wednesday October 992, by
telephone conference call, for an Order
restraining her Majesty the Queen in The
Right of Canada or the Minister of
Employment and Immigration, or any of
their servants or agents, from restraining
the admission into Canada of David Irving
to attend the meeting of the Plaintiff's
organization on October 28, 1992. AND TAKE NOTICE that this Motion
will be served upon Her Majesty The Queen
offices of the Department of Justice in
Vancouver, and that the Plaintiff seeks
league of this court to have the matter
heard on Wednesday, October 21
[corrected in handwriting: 22] ,
1992, in order to enable arrangements to
be made in compliance with the orders of
this court and to enable the continuation
of the meeting of the plaintiff
society. AND TAKE NOTICE that in support of
this Motion will be read the Affidavit of
Richard Grant Levers, of Victoria, British
Columbia, President of the Canadian Free
Speech League. SIGNATURE DOUGLAS H. CHRISTIE Counsel for the Applicant
STATEMENT OF FACT AND LAW I. STATEMENT OP FACTS 1. Mr. David Irving was invited to
receive the 8th Annual George Orwell Free
Speech Award by the Canadian Free Speech
League at its annual banquet on October
28, 1992, in Victoria, British
Columbia. 2. David Irving was given
a
note by the Canadian
Consulate in Los Angeles on October 8,
1992, which said: Dear Mr.
Irving: This is further to public
announcement, indicating that you plan
to come to Canada to speak publicly in
the near future. The Canadian Department of
employment and Immigration has asked me
to advise you that on the basis of
information available to us we believe
that you are inadmissible to Canada by
virtue of Section 19 of the Immigration
Act. Section 19 states (in part)
that: "No person shell be granted
admission who is a member of any
following classes... 19 (2) (a) Persons who have been
convicted of an offence that, if
committed in Canada, constitutes or, if
committed outside Canada, would
constitute an offence that may be
punishable by way of indictment under
any other Act of Parliament and for
which a maximum term of imprisonment of
less than ten years say be imposed. 19 (l) (d) (i) Persons who there are
reasonable grounds to believe will
commit one or more offences punishable
by way of indictment under any Act of
Parliament." Therefore should you appear at a
Canadian Port of Entry or come to the
attention of an immigration officer in
Canada, you will be reported on the
grounds that your admission would be
contrary to the Immigration Act. An
immigration inquiry will be directed
with a view affecting your removal from
Canada. Yours truly, [Signature] Consul" 3. David Irving has only one
conviction
which is under appeal in Munich, Germany
for defamation of the memory the
dead. 4. No equivalent criminal offence
is known to Canadian law. 5. David Irving has been to Canada
on speaking tours on 20 previous occasions
and has committed no previous criminal
offences, and there is no reason to
believe he will breach Canadian
law. 6. The actions of the Minister are
arbitrary and constitute a conspiracy to
deny the civil rights and freedom of the
Plaintiff guaranteed by the Charter of
Rights & Freedoms, as guaranteed by
Section 2 (a), (b), (c) and (d) of the
Charter of Rights & Freedoms. 7. The Plaintiff seeks a remedy
under section 24 (1) of the Charter of
Rights and Freedoms as follows: (1) An order enjoining the
Minister of Immigration from
interfering or preventing the entry of
David Irving to Canada.(2) An order restraining the
Minister of Immigration from further
interference or denial of the civil
liberties of the Plaintiff without
further order of the Court. ALL
OF WHICH IS RESPECTFULLY
SUBMITTED:
D.H.Christie DOUGLAS H. CHRISTIE . Counsel for the Applicant, Canadian Free Speech
League
October 15, 1992. |