S E C R E
T Report No. PWIS Det(N)/18
REPORT ON INTERROGATION OF PRISONERNO. 211 Stubaf. Aumeier, Hans AKERSHUS PRISON - 10
AUG 45 PREAMBLE Aumeier is one of the
rarer types of
officers by his appearance. Small of stature, his
slovenly gait, guttural voice uncouth manners induce one to
believe that his services must have been considered of great
value in order to obtain the rank of Stubaf. The matter
contained in this report can be considered reliable in so
far as this man is humanly capable of speaking the truth.
All his statements have been checked, rechecked and
cross-checked with the help of some of his colleagues. It
must be remembered that he is completely uneducated and
almost illiterate. A great deal can be seen from his life
history prior to joining the .
He seems to have been unable to hold any job for any length
of time, which of course can be partly the fault of the
economic and social crisis of the time. The interrogator is
satisfied that the bulk of the material in this report
conforms with the truth in as far as it is concerned with
facts, but Aumeier's personal reactions and feelings as
stated in this report may have changed somewhat since his
fate has taken a turn to the worse. PART I1. PRISONER'S LIFE HISTORY 20 Aug 06 | Born in Amberg | 1912/15 | Volksschule in Amberg | 1915/18 | Realschule in Amberg | 1918 | Fitter apprentice with a small private
firm. | 1919 | Turner and fitter with a rifle
factory | 1923/24 | as above but as a qualified
craftsman | 1924/25 | Unemployed | 1925 | After an unsuccessful attempt to join the
Reichswehr he returned to the former rifle
factory. | 1925 | Unemployed | 1925/26 | Casual labour in Munich with various
firms | 1926 | summer Unemployed | 1926/spring 1929 | Casual labour all over Germany.
"Wanderschaft" | 1929 | Unemployed | 1931 | Hauptamt der SA, where he worked in the
Kartei | 1931 | Transferred to the
where he worked in the garage | 15 Jan 34 | Joined the Totenkopf Verband. |
2. PRISONER'S CAREER IN THE . 15 Jan 34 | Joined the Totenkopf Verbände in
Dachau. After his training there he was employed
as instructor for the new recruits. | Nov 34 | After successfully passing the
Zugführer (Pl Comd) course he was promoted
to
Ustuf. | Nov 35 | Promoted to
Ostuf. With this rank he became OC the
recruiting unit and responsible for their
training. | Spring 37 | Posted to 12
Wach Kp. Weimar which guarded
Reichsstatthalterei and/the
Innenministerium. | Jul 37 | Wachkommandoführer at Burg Vogelsang
(Eifel) | Jan 38 | Returned to the Führer course in
Dachau where he remained until Mar 33 when he
went to Austria during the Anschluss. There he
was with a Wach- u. Streifenkommando in
Salzburg. | Oct 38 | With the same unit in Asch, Franzensbad
and Eger. | Nov 38 | Promoted to
Hastuf. In spite of his request to be allowed to
return to the Fahrbereitschaft of the
Verwaltungsamt München he had to remain
with the Totenkopfverband. | Summer 39 | Posted to the Totenkopf Sturmbann
stationed in Flossenbürg. At the outbreak
of war he made two written requests asking for a
transfer to a field unit to fight at the front.
Both these requests were, however
refused. | Jun 42 | Posted to the concentration Camp
Auschwitz (Oswiecim), Poland. There he was in
charge of Abt III and
Schutzhaftlagerführer. | End May 43 | Had to report to
Gruppenfü Glücks in Oranienburg where
he was instructed to report to the Höherer
u. Pol. Führer "Ostland",
Ogruppenf Jeckeln. This was the first
semi-operational posting Aumeier had with which
he was apparently very satisfied. Reported in
Riga at the beginning of Jun of the same year to
Jeckeln end to the
Wirtschafter. He was, however, disappointed
because he was posted
Baubrigade of the 3
(gem) Panzer Korps. This
Baubrigade with almost exclusively Jewish labour
built for the
Pz.Korps and for the 18th Army in the sector
Oranienbaum-Leningrad. Working together with
this unit was the OT Oberbauleitung "A" which
was a part of the OT Einsatzgruppe
"Russland-Nord" under the command of
Oberbaudirektor Gimple. Aumeier had to establish
a camp in which. all the Jews were kept, clad
and fed and was responsible that they went to
their work by the OT. He was in charge of some
7,000 Jews there. The guard duties ware
performed by an Estonian Schutzpolizei Btl.
| Jan 44 | During the Russian advance Aumeier had to
retreat with the prisoners to the West in
several stages which, according to him, were
carried out without incidents. Mortality was
apparently very small. He claims at during the
time he was in charge of them (Jul 43 - Aug 44)
only 60 prisoners died of natural death.
| Aug 44 | Aumeier was given permission to remove
the prisoners back to Germany. This permission
was given to him by Jeckeln. For this purpose he
managed to got two ships from the Marinekommando
Reval (Korv. Kapt. Nicol) which at that time was
forming a convoy | 20 Aug 44 | The transport moved off and Aumeier
ultimately handed over the prisoners to KB
Danzig-Stutthof. The guards on beard ship at his
disposal were eighty Estonian policemen and
twelve German
Unterführer. After completion of this task
he went, together with some twenty
Unterführern back to RIGA where he was
attached to a Polizei Btl (284?), a sub- unit of
Kampfgruppe Jeckeln. There he was Pl Comd
instructing his unit in field craft nr Aduci,
some 30-40 km in front of Riga. One attempt was
made to attack the island Ösel but was
unsuccessful. Whatever may have been 'the part
played by Aumeier in this engagement it was the
only action in which he took part. | Oct 44 | Shortly before the surrender of Riga they
were transported back to Gotenhafen (Gdinja).
There he was ordered to report to
Gruppenfü Glücks in
Berlin-Oranienburg. Aumeier took this
opportunity and asked for permission to be
posted back to his unit. He was anxious to see
his family again in Munich. Glücks wanted
to grant this and posted him back to Dachau, but
meanwhile he had been taken ill with eye trouble
and was sent to the
Lazarett. | 9 Nov 44 | Whilst there he was promoted to
Stubaf. He remained im hospital till middle of
Jan 45. On his discharge he had to report to
Stubaf Harbaum in Oranienburg, who asked him
whether he wanted to go to Norway. Aumeier asked
for leave first, but as the order coming from
Gruppenführer Pohl had to be carried out
immediately Aumeier had to fly at once with
Stubaf Pauli (of KL Stutthof and previously
Neuengamme), who would give him further
details. | 22 Jan 45 | Arrival by air in Oslo. Pauli, who
accompanied Aumeier, disclosed that he had been
detailed by Pohl to make a reconnaissance and
see if it was not possible to build a camp in
middle of Southern Norway which would hold some
2-3,000 men and which could be used as a
Truppenwirtschaftslager. Aumeier asked him what
his task would be im this matter, and whether
this Camp was to become a concentration camp.
Pauli gave a negative reply end showed him two
secret letters. One was from Ostubaf Weiss to
Pohl in which it was stated that that there was
already a Schutzhaftlager in Grini and that the
need for another Camp or concentration camp was
not great. The second letter was from the
Reichsführer
Himmler to Rediess dated October or November 44
in which he wrote that a concentration camp is
out of the question in Norway for political
reasons and that the BdS is to look after his
own prisoners. (Note:- It may be worth noting
that in spite of these two letters all
-
officers and -men
who were supervising the building of this
cramp, as well
[as?]
personnel of Viktoria Terrasse, state
quite solemnly that the camp was destined to
be a concentration camp. -
Gruppenfü Sporrenberg states that the
location of that camp was at Moyen; he also
declares that it was generally taken for
granted by Rediess and his circle that this
camp was to be a concentration camp). | End Jan 45 | A few days after their arrival they were
to report to -Wirtschafter
Standartenfü Prietzel. As the latter was at
the time on a duty journey in Berlin they
reported to Rediess instead, and Pauli (in the
presence of Aumeier) put forward their task here
in Norway and their suggestions. Rediess however
stressed that he had no camps to put at their
disposal and suggested that they should await
the return of the -Wirtschafter.
On the return of Prietzel who came back from
Berlin they found that the was in the picture as
to what had to be done. He said that in order to
build a camp he would have to arrange that the
prisoners of Grini could be used. On the return
of their tour of inspection of Wehrmacht Camps
they reported to Rediess that the Wehrmacht
could only evacuate the camp at Mysen. Rediess
instructed Pauli to report to Berlin on the
progress and on 7 Feb he left again for Germany.
Aumeier then organised his labourers for which
he got 61 Russian PW with 20 Wehrmacht guards.
These he obtained from Hptm. Scharf or Scharte.
For further labourers he turned to Fehlis and he
was agreeable that prisoners from Grini should
be used, but he could not supply any guard
troops whatsoever. Neither the Wehrmacht nor the
police could spare any troops for guard duties.
This delayed the work a great deal. Rediess had
meanwhile asked for more troops from Pohl in
Berlin much to Aumeier's annoyance since he
wanted to take the opportunity of settling the
matter personally by going to Germany. Rediess
was supplied with the necessary troops with
instructions that they were under his
responsibility for arms, ammunition,
etc. | Mar 45 | Towards the end of the month 150 men
arrived from Oranienburg. The men were mostly
Hungarians with the exception of the
Unterführer. They were for the greater part
untrained. After the arrival of the guards the
Russians were withdrawn together with the
Wehrmacht. Instead some 340-350 prisoners from
Grini came as substitute. Aumeier states that
they liaised very closely with Norwegian Red
Cross in order to obtain cigarettes tobacco, and
other comforts. It is learnt that this is
correct and that the treatment of the prisoners
was correct. | 7 May 45 | On the day of the capitulation Aumeier
let the prisoners go free and opened the camp
for visitors. The prisoners had, however, agreed
amongst themselves that they did not want to
leave until 8 May 45. Herr Aas from the
Norwegian Red Cross had made the necessary
transport arrangements with the railway and the
camp was completely cleared on the same
day. | 11 Jun 45 | Aumeier was arrested at the camp in
Terningmoen im Aumeier in full uniform and
without any forged papers. |
PART IIK. L. A U S C H W I T Z ======================== (Jun 42 - May 43) PREAMBLE The following
account of the KL Auschwitz (Oswiecim) in Poland was made by
Aumeier only. For some considerable time he denied any
knowledge of the camp and that he had anything to do with
it. It was not until witnesses (both Polish inmates during
his time and German -men
who were in the notorious camp came, that he realised that
it was useless to disguise the fact that he was
Schutzhaftlagerleiter. In this capacity he was responsible
for discipline and order among the prisoners. In the
interrogator's opinion it is believed that a great deal of
information can still be had on. the subject but it is
unlikely that Aumeier with his memory can supply that
information. His memory for names is very poor.. It can
fairly safely be assumed that Aumeier is not withholding
purposely much information. 1. CAMP ORGANISATION The Camp administration and executive was divided
into six Abteilungen. The Lagerkommandant (Camp Comd) was
the senior offr and in many ways merely the nominal head of
the entire concern. (a) Abteilung I This was the department which carried out
the task of the Commandant.Verwaltung: (Kommandantur). The camp commandant
was immediately subordinate to Amtsgruppe "D" in
Oranienburg. He received direct orders from that
Amtsgruppe "D" or the orders from
Reichsführer- ,
Wirtschafts-V.H.A., R.S.H.A. , and from the
Reichskriminal- u. Polizeiamt. The various Abteilungen
were directly subordinate to the camp comd or they were
under him for the purposes of administration in so far as
they were not subordinate to any other dept outside the
camp. Through his orders he was the man who directed
policy and was responsible for work and its execution by
all the Abteilungen under his command. If any department
had direct orders from any Outside department he could
consult the Abteilungsleiter or submit his
protests. (b) Abteilung Ia This was a sub-unit of the above and was
commanded by the Adjt. This Abt dealt with all mail, put
forward suggestions, handed in papers for signature, etc.
Further duties were the distribution of orders and
dismissals. The Adjt was at the same time superior to all
Unterführer and men of the HQ. In this HQ was also the personnel branch and the
-
Gerichtsabt. In the capacity of the latter the adjt
carried out all the interrogations of prisoners who had
committed any offence against the camp rules. He made
recommendations for punishments of the prisoners and
submitted them to the Comd for his approval. More serious
offences were dealt with in conjunction with the
-Gericht
in Breslau. Matters dealing with or concerning the
prisoners directly had nothing to do with him. (c) Abteilung II This was the so--called political Abteilung.
The head of the Abteilung was a member of the Gestapo and
he was directly subordinate to the Chief in Kattowitz. He
was, however, indirectly under the commandant in so far
as he had to keep the commandant in the picture and
submit to him new changes of policy or in any special
measures as ordered by the Gestapo. In this Abt all
measures concerning the prisoners were dealt with from
the day they arrived until the day they were either
released or killed. Every prisoner was entered in files.
They also carried out interrogations and investigations
concerning major offences, and reports regarding their
punishments were submitted directly to the camp comd. Any
recommendation for release of a prisoner. was
investigated by this Abt, especially in cases of habitual
criminals and major political opponents. They also acted
as a reception committee opening a file for each new
arrival and giving him his number. In the case of death
(except of Jews) this Abt informed the next-of-kin.
Subordinate to this Abt were the crematoria which were
run by a Häftlingskommando (squad of prisoners)
which was under comd of a member of this Abt. If the
next-of-kins desired it this Abt also arranged for the
burial of the urns at the nearest cemetery. The prisoners handed in by the Gestapo
and not through the RSHA were directly under their
command and their release was arranged by them
(Arbeitserziehungshäftlinge). These prisoners were
generally only 42 days in the KL. (d) Abteilung III Schutzhaftlager:
This was directly under the commandant. The chief of this
Abt was at the same time Erster
Schutzhaftlagerführer (Aumeier). According to the
size of the camp one or two other -Führer
were at his disposal as Lagerführer. Also under his
command wore the Rapportführer and Blockführer.
The Schutzhaftlagerführer was responsible for the
cleanliness, tidiness and discipline of the prisoners. He
had to see that the working parties left promptly on
time, was responsible for roll calls, lights out, etc.
For minor offences he recommended appropriate
punishments, but had no powers to mete out punishments
without referring the matters to the commandant first.
Recommendations for releases were also submitted by this
Abt to the Comd. Postal censorship was also done by Abt
III, and distribution of parcels to the prisoners. In
cases of doubt the Abteilungsleiter made the final
decision. (e) Abteilung III Arbeitseinsatzführung. Usually
commanded by the 2nd i/c of the Abt. He was responsible
for making up the working parties according to trades, as
far as possible. He liaised very closely with local firms
and armament factories. (f) Abteilung IV The Verwaltungsführer was directly
responsible to Amtsgruppe "D" in Oranienburg. He was
subordinate to the Commandant as far as supplies,
clothing and other matters were concerned. In close
liaison this Abt worked with III as far as personal
effects of the prisoners were concerned. Prisoners'
moneys and, belongings were exclusively dealt with by
Abt. IV. (g) Abteilung V Standortarzt. Direct under Amtsgruppe
"D" in Oranienburg. Under his comd were the dentists,
doctors, chemists and medical orderlies. Those incapable
of any work were recommended for extermination by the
head of this Abt. (h) Abteilung VI Truppenbetreuung (Welfare of the
troops) This Abt was responsible for politically
educating the guard troops. Responsible to Amtsgruppe "D"
in Oranienburg. (i) Abteilung Landwirtschaft This dept dealt with agricultural matters of
the camp area. It was subordinate to the
W. u. V.H.A. Berlin. (j) Bauleitung The Leiter of this Abt was responsible to
Amtsgruppe "C" of
W. u. V.H.A. Berlin. He was responsible to the commandant
only in so far as camp construction and garrison
engineering was concerned. (k) Betriebsdirektor This man liaised with local armament firms
and essential industries. He was on the camp strength but
was at the same time a member of
W. u. V.H.A. Berlin. 2. SUB-DIVISION OF CAMP During Aumeier's time the CAMP consisted
of:-- Stammlager I
- Lager II - Birkenau
- Frauenlager Birkenau (Women's Camp)
The outlying camps had the following
Arbeitskommandos: - Buna Werke Monowitz
- Jawischowitz
- Golbeschau
- Kobier
- Grosschelm
- Eintrachthütte Schwindochlowitz
- Jaworochnow
Apart from the above, Abt. Landwirtschaft
had: - Hermense
- Budy
- Babitz
- Dwory
3. AUMEIER'S EXPERIENCE IN AUSCHWITZ At the time Aumeier
came to Auschwitz he was initiated as
Schutzhaftlagerführer Abt III by the comd Stubaf
Höss. At that time Aumeier had about 13,000 prisoners
under him and his 2nd i/c as Ostuf Schwarz. To carry out his
task he had some 50-60 -men
who were detailed as Blockführer. Most of these men
were senior NCOs. In this capacity he was 2nd i/c of the
whole camp and deputised for the comd in his absence.
Aumeier states, however that as deputy he had no powers to
order punishments. He retained any recommendations awaiting
the return of the comd. This seems probable in theory but in
practice this order was not strictly adhere to, judging by
statements of others. Aumeier furthermore states that he
took very severe disciplinary measures if any man under his
comd carried out punishments without due authorisation. He
states that to hurry prisoners along they were allowed to
"push" them. This can of course be widely interpreted and
the has admitted that it came to beatings with rifle butts
and sticks. Aumeier set the fashion of certain expressions
when referring to prisoners and women prisoners which were
in due course generally used. a. Transport of Jewish prisoners In approx. Jul 42 large
transports of Jewish prisoners arrived in Auschwitz from
Slovakia, Holland and France. These transports were at first
all under the command of a -Ostubaf
Hildebrand or Hermann (?) of the RSHA. According to a
statement made by Höss this man was responsible to the
RFSS personally for the transports of the Jews. The
Stammlager was soon overcrowded since these transports.
holding anything from 800 to 1,500 prisoners arrived almost
daily, sometimes as many as two in 24 hrs. For this reason
prisoners had to be sent to the outlying camp Birkenau which
was then still under construction. Finally there were only
1400-1500 prisoners in the Stammlager which housed in the
main prisoners who worked in neighbouring factories
Bauleitung and agriculture. On arrival the women
were separated from the men and if there were any children
they remained with the mother (if female) or with the father
(if male), provided they were under 14 years of age. The
camp doctor then separated the aged and infirm and sent them
on to another camp. In the autumn of 1942
a typhoid epidemic broke out together with para-typhus. Some
3,000 prisoners died at that time and were buried in
Birkenau. Only Germans and Poled (non-Jewish) were cremated
in Auschwitz. Later on en order came out from RFSS that all
the bodies were to be exhumed again and were to be cremated.
To perform this task Stundartenfü Bloml or Plobel (?)
was attached to the camp who supervised the burning of the
bodies which could not all be burnt in the crematorium owing
to lack of space. Most bodies were burnt on piles. Ustuf
Hessler was detailed by the commandant to supervise the
Kommando of Jewish prisoners who had to do the exhuming and
burning. Aumeier estimated the number of exhumed bodies to
be 1400-1500. The crematoria as such were under Ustuf
Grabner, head of the political Abt. In the winter 42/43
three more crematoria were built to meet the needs. (b) Extermination of the Jews in Gas
Chambers Auschwitz earned its
notorious reputation as "Vernichtungs-lager Auschwitz" from
Nov 42 onwards. In that month the gassing of some 50-80
prisoners took place very secretly. It was done in the
mortuary which was attached to the crematorium. The
organisers of this were the commandant, the camp doctor and
Ustuf Grabner. Some medical orderlies wore also present.
Aumeier knew nothing this extermination and was only taken
into the confidence of the Camp comd the next day. That day
the camp doctor, Grabner, Hessler, Schwarz and Aumeier were
summoned to the commandant office when the comd told then
under the strictest secrecy that a he had received an order,
from the RFSS via the RSHA in BERLIN that all Jewish
prisoners who were infirm, sick or incapable of work were to
be gassed in order to prevent further spreading of diseases.
The commandant mentioned that the previous night the first
exterminations had been carried out and that it was found
that the improvised gas chamber did nothing like meet the
needs so that in the erection of the new crematoria in
Birkenau gas chambers will have to be built as permanent
fixtures. The whole affair was "Geheime Reichssache" and
they were warned that any indiscretion on the subject or
careless talk would on the orders of Himmler be punished by
death. On the strength of this they had to sign a statement
that they were warned and instructed to that effect and this
document was kept under lock and key in the office of the
comd. Any additional members that joined the gang later were
likewise put into the picture and warned by Ustuf Grabner
and their documents were under his supervision. Aumeier
states that the general reaction at the briefing was that of
shock at such drastic measures but that they were
nevertheless very excited. In the ensuing days three or four
more exterminations took place in the Stammlager but the
means were really inadequate for their ambitious designs. It
was usually done in the late evening hours. In the mortuary there
were 2 or 3 ventilation shafts. Through these cyclone gas
was poured by the medical orderlies who were protected by
gas masks. The initiated members were not allowed to
approach the spectacle for self protection, in case any gas
might leak out of the chamber. The victims arrived
with their transports and were received into the camp by the
members of the political Abteilung who sought out their
prey. All those for extermination were segregated and told
to undress for disinfection and de-lousing. They were then
marched of to the gas chamber under the pretext of having a
bath and the doors were securely locked behind them. The
medical orderlies then poured in the lethal gas and the
guards(selected by Aumeier) marched off. Aumeier was told
that the death struggle only lasted about one minute. It
must be noted that the prisoners never had the slightest
idea of their dreadful fate. The children were mostly with
their parents and the babies were invariably carried by
their mothers. On the following day
the gas chamber was opened and ventilated, and this was also
an opportunity for sightseeing by the specially selected
sadists. Aumeier states that oven this cold-blooded
extermination was too much for their refined senses, so that
they had to retire to their casino where they indulged in
the consumption of alcohol. c. Further gas chambers in Birkenau As has been mentioned
before, in order to comply with the demands for
extermination further Gas chambers were erected in Birkenau
near the place where the mass graves were. For this purpose,
they converted two empty houses which were fitted out in
accordance with the results of former experiences. This work
was done by Bauleitung. One house had two, the other one
four gas chambers. The two houses were later known as
"Bunker I" and "Bunker II". Each chamber was designed to
cater for 150 victims. The first exterminations there took
place early in Jan 43. By this time Sonderkommando had been
set up of highly reliable -men
under Ustf Grabner, who was directly responsible to the Camp
comd. The exterminations as such were the commitment of
Ustuf Hessler. The scene of the crime was separated by a
series of notices marked: "Sicherungsbereich. Zutritt
strengstens verboten. Der Lagerkommandant". When gassings
were in progress a chain of sentries was put up around the
whole area. To minimise any publicity only eight men were
used. In Birkenau any child under eleven years was
automatically murdered by these means. Sicherungsführer
(Security offrs) of the guards during Aumeier's time were
Hastuf Schwarz, Hastuf Hofmann, Ostuf Schwarzhuber, Ostuf
Sell, Ostuf Müller, Ustuf Grabner, Ustuf Jostinger,
Ustuf Hessler, Ostuf Pfütze, Haschaf Palli and Aumeier.
The day on which the
chambers were ventilated (i.e. the day after the gassing
took place) the medical orderlies under the direction of the
camp dentist started an organised mutilation of the corpses,
i.e. the removal of all gold teeth, and in the case of women
the hair was cut off. Whether any skin was removed for the
manufacture of lampshades as happened in other camps, is
unknown to Aumeier. After the mutilation
had ceased a Häftlingskommando consisting of hulky,
well-fed and strong Jewish prisoners came in under Hessler
and removed the corpses to the crematorium. These prisoners
were guarded by the Sonderkommando and were kept completely
isolated from all other prisoners. In some cases the bodies
were burnt. in the pits which were previously used when the
order to bury all bodies was carried out. In Apr 43 the new
crematorium in Birkenau was ready and consisted of eight
ovens. By this time the ingenuity of the Sonderkommando had
reached its peak in that below the crematorium the gas
chambers were situated and were large enough to cope with
800 prisoners at one time. In front of the gas chamber were
the undressing rooms. To save time the "Bunker" was fitted
out with a proper airing and ventilating mechanism so that
one could enter the chamber already after some five or six
hours. The bodies were placed on a lift and taken to the
floor above and slid straight into the oven for immediate
burning. All valuables belonging to the victims were sent to
BERLIN (ss W. u. V.H.A.). Likewise were the teeth and hair.
Clothes, in so far as they were of use to the prison , were
retained and partially issued to the prisoners. May 43 saw the opening
of another crematorium where exterminations were carried out
alternatively. The actual gas chamber was a little smaller
and could only hold 500 victims. Yet a third crematorium was
under construction when Aumeier left and was similar in
every respect to Crematorium II. It had only five
ovens (d) Court Cases From time to time a
Standgericht assembled either in Kattowitz or in Auschwitz
dealing with prisoners. Aumeier was only once present at one
of those when a Pole was condemned death for assaulting a
German woman. Whether that sentence was given by instruction
from the RFSS or from the Gauleiter was unknown. The
condemned man was sent into solitary confinement whilst
waiting to be informed of the sentence. The commandant, the
Leiter of Abt II, and Gestapo members from Kattowitz went
into his cell and a translated version of the sentence was
read out by an interpreter. The prisoner was then taken into
the court yard where he was shot through the head in the
presence of a doctor. There was no strict routine or
procedure in these matters and Aumeier does not know whether
any form or files or records were kept. He assumes that the
next-of-kin were usually informed. (e) Disciplinary Actions The following are
the disciplinary punishments permitted in the concentration
camp. It must be remembered that these are only the ones
authorised from BERLIN. (i) Verwarnung (Reprimand). No physical
punishments were given after the first reprimand. The
prisoner was warned that any future occurrence or other
infringement would be severely dealt with.(ii) Heavy manual labour on Sundays. This was
usually given for laziness or absent-mindedness during
work or any sort of inefficiency during work hours. The
reports requesting this punishment were sent at in by the
sentries, Blockführer or Kapos. They were handed to
Aumeier in writing. On receipt of this report Aumeier
interrogated the prisoner. It was a very rare thing for a
prisoner ever to deny the charges against him. (iii) Arrest. This punishment was graded in three
forms a) three days. Normal rations. b) Seven days. Only every fourth day a warm meal was
served. Normal food was bread and water. c) Fourteen days. Rations as for (b). (iv) Stehbunker (Standing cell) Prisoners were put
into this cell for more serious infringements, i.e..
communicating with civilians outside the camp. The
prisoner had to carry out ordinary manual labour and
spend up to. three nights in this cell in which it was
impossible to lie down or get any sleep. After one night
most of the prisoners had already become victims. They
were, incapable of carrying out their work, and were sent
to the sick room, where they were under the care of the
notorious doctor who according to his mood could classify
prisoners as "useless" and send them to Birkenau. The
chain of command was such that each person in turn could
hand on the responsibility to another person, i.e. the
Rapportführer reports the case to the
Schutzhaft-lagerführer who in turn reports to the
camp comd. The comd metes out the punishment after which
the prisoner is a medical commitment for a the doctor who
can send the man to Birkenau where his fate, unless he
shows remarkable signs of improvement, was certain
death. (V) Beating. This punishment was given for theft
and for removal of food from the kitchen or articles
which prisoners were not allowed to have in their
possession. The Rapportführer sent in his report to
Aumeier who interrogated the prisoner to see if the
charge was true. Here again it was in the prisoner's
interest to admit the charge made against him. The report
was then forwarded to the camp comd with the
recommendations made by Aumeier and the camp commandant
gave the sentence of 5,10,15 or 25 strokes with a stick.
Permission had to be obtained from Berlin (Oranienburg)
sanctioning the punishment. This usually caused a lapse
of a week to a fortnight before the prisoner was finally
punished. Aumeier furthermore states that he did not
tolerate any punishments which were carried out without
having been approved through normal channels. It is
however, possible and it is in fact known through
statements made by prisoners that the Blockführers
and similar "officials" meted out punishments as and when
they liked. AS the prisoners were in permanent fear of
these men he would never dare to hand in adverse reports
about them, which is one of the reasons why Aumeier does
not know what went on behind the scene. Witnesses at
these corporal punishments were the doctor, the camp
commandant, usually deputised by Aumeier; and the
Rapportführer. They had to append their signature as
witnesses that the punishment had been carried out. The
actual beating was done by a fellow prisoner who was
mostly the senior prisoner in the block and chosen for
his sadistic inclinations; category of this prisoner was
usually habitual criminal. If the prisoner who was
ordered had not voluntarily accepted this task he was
threatened with the same fate. By this means every
guard or administration offr can openly and truthfully
state never to have done any harm or laid hands on any
prisoner. After the beating the prisoner returned to
solitary confinement three days. (f) Conclusion This is a brief
summary of Aumeier's deeds and misdeeds in that camp. It can
be realised that this is nothing like a full report of his
activities there. A further report will be made when
evidence of Polish citizens who were prisoners in the camp
during Aumeier's time has been collated. It is believed that
by this means Aumeier will see himself brought to a point
where he will give the whole story complete with every
detail he can recall. The rough outlines contained in this
report do correspond to the truth but will not mark him as a
criminal but merely as a participant in the crime. PWIS Akershus Prison, Oslo. 22 Aug 45 Distribution:- GS Int(b)/G-2 Div, HQ, ALFN -
35 File - 1 Spares - 4
|