Picture: Mr. Justice
Gray
You are invited as always to submit any errors detected.
| "Essay
in Perversity" The
Judgment handed down in the British High Court action by
David Irving against Penguin Books Ltd and Deborah
Lipstadt
The
134-page special including many unusual illustrations is
uploaded as a compressed PDF file (2.3 MB): save it -
print it - share it!
Note:
Your server may not permit large file-downloads.
Note:
The Legally Binding Version of the Judgment is
that issued by the High Court, which was once available
on their website at
this link.
It differs from the version downloaded from this page: it
contains the original errors, and no illustrations or
annotations. Alphabetical
site index (text) |
Department of
How-Do-They-Figure-That-Out? |
Three
British Lord Justices of Appeal get their wigs in a twist
over the smear-phrase Holocaust Denier:
We
are not persuaded that the expression can be given any
precise technical meaning or that 'Holocaust denier'
defines a class of persons precisely. Having regard to
the views expressed by [David Irving] about a
range of events in the history of the Third Reich, we
agree with the Judge that the applicant may be
described as a Holocaust
denier.
-- Lord Justices Pill, Mantell, and Buxton in July
2001, explaining their reason for refusing the Irving
Appeal. [Full
judgment] |
|