[images and
captions added by this website] London, Monday, August 1, 2005
Saatchi charges
Tories £1.5m for failed campaign By Andrew
Pierce LORD SAATCHI, the former
Conservative chairman, charged the party £1.5
million for the services of his advertising
companies in the general election campaign that he
helped to create. The revelation that Lord Saatchi billed
the cash-strapped party while he was chairman has
astonished senior Tories. David
Irving comments: A FEW helpful notes for
our foreign readers. The Saatchi
brothers are the owners of a large art
collection, much of which would have been
classified in Nazi Germany as Schmutz
und Schund (smut & filth), which
was one rung lower even than Entartete
Kunst. Sculptures made entirely of
frozen blood, that sort of thing (I kid
you not). Moreover they are -- like their
agency's current victim Michael
Howard, the (affable, avuncular and
all the other As except *sshole) leader of
the British Conservative Party which
Saatchis have just billed for $3m --
Jewish. One of the Saatchis -- I
forget which , it could have been either
-- protested when The Daily
Telegraph published his photograph,
claiming it was a clear instance of
anti-Semitism to do so. We disagree: they
are both handsome beyond disbelief: Schmutz:
Maurice Saatchi und
Schund: Charles
Saatchi
But what is a $3m
charge among friends? It calls to our
incorrigible mind the loping, beerglass
gripping figure of Anthony Julius,
Lipstadt's (all the A's) attorney in her
trial for libel: he clutched her Royal
Highness Princess Diana's elbow as
her legal adviser and steered her through
her divorce case against Prince Charles,
securing a monster, multi-million pound,
cash settlement in her lifetime. Thereafter, his law firm
Mishcon de Reya set up The Diana Memorial
Trust Fund, which raked in the shekels
from all over the world; and thereafter
that, so to speak, Julius secretly charged
the Fund more than $2m for his first
year's work in setting up the fund. Or so
we're told by the newspapers (more
anti-Semitism). We're not sure if that
included postage and sundries. Julius also started off
offering to defend Lipstadt free in her
libel action, pro bono, as lawyers say;
but somehow there too a bill resulted at
the end of the day. Never forget, to coin a
phrase; never forget. | When he resigned from the Shadow Cabinet after the
election defeat he [Saatchi] delivered a
withering denunciation of the campaign that centred
on asylum and immigration. The payments to Lord
Saatchi's companies are revealed in the newly
published Conservative Party accounts for 2004
which state: "Central Office purchased services and
paid commission amounting to £339,000 and
£207,000 respectively from the Immediate Sales
Company and M&C Saatchi companies in which Lord
Saatchi has an interest."A further £19,000 was paid in 2003. The
Times has learnt that Lord Saatchi invoiced the
party for a further £1 million for work in
2005 before polling day. The 2004 accounts showed
that he made a £6,000 donation to the
party. The Immediate Sales Company has subsequently
pitched for commercial contracts on the back of the
work done on the Tory campaign. Most members of the
board of the Conservative Party were taken aback to
discover that Lord Saatchi's companies had
financially benefited from a campaign he publicly
criticised in a newspaper article within days of
the defeat, and later in a pamphlet for a Tory
think-tank. A senior Tory official said: "The board has decided to declare in
the accounts any potential conflicts of
interest. Maurice (Saatchi) may be uncomfortable
to see his transactions in the accounts, but so
be it. Maurice was not popular after he went
public with his criticisms of the campaign
which, as co-chairman, he was partly responsible
for. I think he will be even less popular when
people discover just how much money he has
charged the party."I am sure his companies did a great job. But
you have to ask. Was the work put out to tender?
Were there no other companies capable of doing
the work as well?" Lord Saatchi did not return telephone calls
yesterday. A Conservative Party spokesman declined
to comment. In a pamphlet for the Thatcherite
Centre for Policy Studies last month, Lord Saatchi
accepted his responsibility for the campaign, in
which the Tory party barely improved its share of
the vote from the disastrous 2001 election. He said
that the campaign had not projected a "noble
purpose" and had been led instead by focus group
research and opinion polls. "If you don't stand for something you will fall
for anything," he said, adding that the Tories had
been wrong to fight the election on the issue of
immigration. They had underestimated the voters'
intelligence by promising lower taxes when taxes
would have to rise, he said. He attacked the
strategy that treated voters like "morons" who
could understand a message only if it was delivered
by Brad Pitt or Tom Cruise. Comparing the election to a Basil Fawlty
campaign he said that the Conservatives had made
the major mistake of saying, "Don't mention the
economy" - an area that traditionally had been the
party's major strength. Despite his criticisms, the Immediate Sales
Company has been pitching for new business on the
back of the work. In a letter to potential clients,
Michael Moszynski, the chief executive of
the firm that is 80 per cent owned by Lord
Saatchi's advertising empire, claimed: "We created
a campaign that, while it might not have won the
party the election, did help to secure their
biggest electoral success for 22 years." The brochure reproduced the Tory advertisements
including the slogan, "Are you thinking what we're
thinking?" and the hardline posters such as, "It's
not racist to impose limits on immigration". Lord Saatchi rose to fame in 1979 when he coined
the slogan "Labour Isn't Working" for Margaret
Thatcher's election campaign, helping the
Conservatives to defeat Labour. He was also said to
be behind the "demon eyes" poster of Tony
Blair. He founded M&C Saatchi with his
brother Charles in 1995 after they were ousted from
Saatchi & Saatchi, the agency they founded in
1970. |