 Denver, Colorado, Tuesday, November 18,
2003 Readers comment on the
article by Dani Newsum:
"Nazi
swill, coming
soon." 
NO historian is totally without some of bias, but
having noted that, Irving's works are quite
interesting and informative, since he learned
German to speak directly with German WW2 vets and
survivors. For this pinhead "reporter" to be so
contemptuous of Irving's scholarship is nothing
short of hilarious! -- Greg Krieger
READING this former "snivel rites" shyster
(surprise, surprise) bloviating about matters her
85 I.Q. precludes her from comprehending was more
fun than watching an old Amos 'n' Andy episode. I
won't waste time refuting her (it's both pointless
& unnecessary to "refute" a diatribe of moronic
insults anyway). Instead, I'll just mention two
vital points for readers to ponder: - The Jew's standard Hollowcost yarn states
that those Nahzee monsters exterminated God's
Li'l Darlings by dropping Zyklon B into the
Auschwitz "gas chamber" through holes in the
concrete roof. If this is true, why are these
Holes o' Death so conspicuous by their absence?
- If Auschwitz was indeed a "death camp"
snuffing millions of jews with Zyklon B, why did
the Oranienburg camp - which even the jews admit
never was a "death camp" -
RECEIVE THE SAME AMOUNT OF
ZYKLON B AS AUSCHWITZ? Why, them lousy
Krauts musta been eatin' it, then!
I've made none of this up - after all, the Jews
are history's masters at that. Look it up for
yourselves here: http://www.ihr.org/ -- Dirk
James
THIS article is idiotic. Irving has written over
thirty books. Until he questioned whether there was
a written direction from Hitler authorizing the
extermination of the jews and publicised the
chemical analysis of Auschwitz, he had been
regarded as the top rated historian and authority
on Hitler, the Nazis and WWII, He went to primary
sources and interviewed personalities involved. Now
he is public enemy number one because the Zionists
have decided he is too dangerous for their scam.
The author of this article hasn't a clue. --
John
The very people who "used to" champion free speech
now only "allow it" when it's on their side, from
their point of view. What hypocrisy! Where is the
ACLU now? Oh, it was very activist when it was
needed to push a certain agenda (no, we can't speak
of that, because it's suppressed in our media
today). Blacks and other minorities are only used
by the powers that be to push their own agenda. It
will come back to bite them. -- Glenda Smith |
![[]](../../std/dings/list.gif){kind=small}
write to David
Irving