The
answer is this: once a bully,
always a bully. |
Ha'aretzApril 8, 2003 Sharon:
The mask is off By Uzi Benziman ARIEL Sharon has in
recent days delivered a conclusive answer
to those who had been wondering whether he
had changed his stripes since his election
as prime minister. The answer is this:
once a bully, always a bully. Sharon is the perfect exemplar
of the violent Israeli, the sort who
tramples his neighbor and who responds
wildly and screams bloody murder whenever
anyone tries to put him in his place.
That's what he always used to be; and now
it turns out that his term as prime
minister did nothing to soften the edges,
and change his behavioral traits. The
moment he gets into trouble, the moment he
sets a goal for himself, he doesn't fret
about the means used to get what he wants.
He doesn't flinch about breaking the rules
of the game - and sometimes these rules
happen to be actual laws. And when he's
called on to make accounts, he puts on a
martyr's face, playing the part of a
victim of some heinous miscarriage of
justice. As an army officer, Sharon's military
talents were often counterbalanced by
criticism of his proclivity to interpret
orders given to him as he saw fit.
Whenever his actions were scrutinized,
Sharon responded as though he were being
persecuted by people seeped with envy of
his success, who wanted to blame him for
misdeeds done by others. That is how he
acted after acts of reprisal undertaken at
Qibya (in 1953), after the misadventure at
the Mitla Pass (during the 1956 Sinai
War), the 1973 Yom Kippur War and the
Lebanon War. When he left the Israel Defense Forces,
against his will, Sharon delivered a
disgraceful speech to his army colleagues
in which he shamelessly attacked his
superiors, and threw in some partisan
political barbs. When he left his division
after the Yom Kippur War (as a major
general in the reserves), Sharon saw fit
to release an order in which he attacked
the state's political and military
leadership for the war's errors, and
basically called on his soldiers to
support his political endeavors. In his political career, Sharon has
come across as a bull raging back and
forth in its arena. As a minister in
Menachem Begin's government, he
quarreled with his cabinet colleagues,
attacked them savagely, and was not loath
to firing some blunt accusations at the
prime minister himself. Whenever one of
them dared to stand up to Sharon, he
responded with unbridled violent invective
("Mr. Deputy, I'll strip you bare on this
government table," he yelled at Deputy
Prime Minister Yigal Yadin). Sharon
introduced vulgar, unrestrained idiom to
Israel's political discourse, and his
crude broadsides reached the point at
which a motion was forwarded to dismiss
officially his attacks on Begin. He
operated on a particularly short fuse
whenever realization of his personal
ambitions seemed within reach (as in his
campaign to wrest the defense portfolio,
after Ezer Weizman resigned as
defense minister). Concurrently, he
wallowed in self pity whenever his
behavior stirred opposition ("They are
spilling my blood," he moaned. "They're
spreading vile gossip about me"). Sharon waged his political battles with
a mix of aggression, patronizing
self-righteousness, media manipulation,
and the occasional deviation from the
truth. His track record was littered with
verdicts reached by IDF judicial
tribunals, state commissions of inquiry
and courts which ruled (among other
things) that Sharon failed to act squarely
with his superiors. None of this was a secret in February
2001, but Sharon's past did not stop a
vast majority of the public from voting
him into the Prime Minister's Office. The
bitter fruit of this election result is
currently being eaten by the state, in all
its spheres. Sharon's last public appearance
resoundingly vindicated Napoleon's
dictum that if you scratch a Russian
soldier you'll find a Tartar. Sharon and
his sons are the objects of an
investigation about funds which they used
to help erase an illegal contribution
which he received in 1999. Sharon is not
providing answers to the accusations;
instead of giving intelligible answers,
he's attacking the nation's law
authorities and the media. He has taken on
the role of the victim so as to violate
the nation's election campaign laws and
attack his political rival, Amram Mitnza,
who has no connection to the investigation
against him. Sharon's mask is off, but
whether the public really perceives the
face revealed beneath is to be
doubted.
|