The
firm is well known for running
propaganda campaigns in Arab
countries, including one
denouncing atrocities by Iraq
during its 1990 invasion of
Kuwait.
-- B
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/19/international/19PENT.html
Tuesday, February 19, 2002
[images
added by this
website]
Pentagon
Readies Efforts to Sway Sentiment Abroad
By JAMES DAO and ERIC SCHMITT
The New York Times
WASHINGTON,
Feb. 18 The Pentagon is
developing plans to provide news items,
possibly even false ones, to foreign media
organizations as part of a new effort to
influence public sentiment and policy
makers in both friendly and unfriendly
countries, military officials said.
The plans, which have not received
final approval from the Bush
administration, have stirred opposition
among some Pentagon officials who say they
might undermine the credibility of
information that is openly distributed by
the Defense Department's public affairs
officers.
The military has long engaged in
information warfare against hostile
nations for instance, by dropping leaflets
and broadcasting messages into Afghanistan
when it was still under Taliban rule.
But it recently created the Office
of Strategic Influence, which is
proposing to broaden that mission into
allied nations in the Middle East, Asia
and even Western Europe. The office would
assume a role traditionally led by
civilian agencies, mainly the State
Department.
The small but well-financed Pentagon
office, which was established shortly
after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, was
a response to concerns in the
administration that the United States was
losing public support overseas for its war
on terrorism, particularly in Islamic
countries.
As part of the effort to counter the
pronouncements of the Taliban, Osama
bin Laden and their supporters, the
State Department has already hired a
former advertising executive to run its
public diplomacy office, and the White
House has created a public information
"war room" to coordinate the
administration's daily message
domestically and abroad.
Secretary of Defense Donald H.
Rumsfeld, while broadly supportive of
the new office, has not approved its
specific proposals and has asked the
Pentagon's top lawyer, William J.
Haynes, to review them, senior
Pentagon officials said.
Little information is available about
the Office of Strategic Influence, and
even many senior Pentagon officials and
Congressional military aides say they know
almost nothing about its purpose and
plans. Its multimillion dollar budget,
drawn from a $10 billion emergency
supplement to the Pentagon budget
authorized by Congress in October, has not
been disclosed.
Headed by Brig. Gen. Simon P.
Worden of the Air Force, the new
office has begun circulating classified
proposals calling for aggressive campaigns
that use not
only the foreign media and the Internet,
but also covert operations.
The new office "rolls up all the
instruments within D.O.D. to influence
foreign audiences," its assistant for
operations, Thomas A. Timmes, a
former Army colonel and psychological
operations officer, said at a recent
conference, referring to the Department of
Defense. "D.O.D. has not traditionally
done these things."
|

David Irving comments:
THESE methods are nothing
new. In 1940, Nazi propaganda
minister Dr Joseph Goebbels laid
down basic principles for
government propaganda: one was
that you never spreads lies in
your own government media, which
would be tainted if the lie were
exposed; always use a foreign
newspaper or similar source,
plant the story there, and then
quote that as your source.

[David Irving: Goebbels.
Mastermind of the Third
Reich]
|
One of the office's proposals calls for
planting news items with foreign media
organizations through outside concerns
that might not have obvious ties to the
Pentagon, officials familiar with the
proposal said.
General Worden envisions a broad
mission ranging from "black" campaigns
that use disinformation and other covert
activities to "white" public affairs that
rely on truthful news releases, Pentagon
officials said.
"It goes from the blackest of black
programs to the whitest of white," a
senior Pentagon official said.
Another proposal involves sending
journalists, civic leaders and foreign
leaders e-mail messages that promote
American views or attack unfriendly
governments, officials said.
Asked if such e-mail would be
identified as coming from the American
military, a senior Pentagon official said
that "the return address will probably be
a dot-com, not a dot-mil," a reference to
the military's Internet designation.
To help the new office, the Pentagon
has hired the Rendon Group, a
Washington-based international consulting
firm run by John W. Rendon Jr., a
former campaign aide to President Jimmy
Carter. The firm, which is being paid
about $100,000 a month, has done extensive
work for the Central Intelligence Agency,
the Kuwaiti royal family and the Iraqi
National Congress, the opposition group
seeking to oust President Saddam
Hussein.
Officials at
the Rendon Group say terms of their
contract forbid them to talk about
their Pentagon work. But the firm is
well known for running propaganda
campaigns in Arab countries, including
one denouncing atrocities by Iraq
during its 1990 invasion of
Kuwait.
The firm has been hired as the Bush
administration appears to have united
around the goal of ousting Mr. Hussein.
"Saddam Hussein has a charm offensive
going on, and we haven't done anything to
counteract it," a senior military official
said.
Proponents say the new Pentagon office
will bring much-needed coordination to the
military's efforts to influence views of
the United States overseas, particularly
as Washington broadens the war on
terrorism beyond Afghanistan.
But the new office has also stirred a
sharp debate in the Pentagon, where
several senior officials have questioned
whether its mission is too broad and
possibly even illegal.
Those critics say they are disturbed
that a single office might be authorized
to use not only covert operations like
computer network attacks, psychological
activities and deception, but also the
instruments and staff of the military's
globe- spanning public affairs
apparatus.
Mingling the more surreptitious
activities with the work of traditional
public affairs would undermine the
Pentagon's credibility with the media, the
public and governments around the world,
critics argue.
"This breaks down the boundaries almost
completely," a senior Pentagon official
said.
Moreover,
critics say, disinformation planted in
foreign media organizations, like
Reuters or Agence France-Presse, could
end up being published or broadcast by
American news organizations.
The Pentagon and the Central
Intelligence Agency are barred by law from
propaganda activities in the United
States. In the mid-1970's, it was
disclosed that some C.I.A. programs to
plant false information in the foreign
press had resulted in articles published
by American news organizations.
Critics of the new Pentagon office also
argue that governments allied with the
United States are likely to object
strongly to any attempts by the American
military to influence media within their
borders.
"Everybody understands using
information operations to go after
nonfriendlies," another senior Pentagon
official said. "When people get
uncomfortable is when people use the same
tools and tactics on friendlies."
Victoria Clarke, the assistant
secretary of defense for public
information, declined to discuss details
of the new office. But she acknowledged
that its mission was being carefully
reviewed by the Pentagon.
"Clearly the U.S. needs to be as
effective as possible in all our
communications," she said. "What we're
trying to do now is make clear the
distinction and appropriateness of who
does what."
General Worden, an astrophysicist who
has specialized in space operations in his
27-year Air Force career, did not respond
to several requests for an interview.
General Worden has close ties to his
new boss, Douglas J. Feith, the
under secretary of defense for policy,
that date back to the Reagan
administration, military officials said.
The general's staff of about 15 people
reports to the office of the assistant
secretary of defense for special
operations and low-intensity conflict,
which is under Mr. Feith.
The Office for Strategic Influence also
coordinates its work with the White
House's new counterterrorism office, run
by Wayne A. Downing, a retired
general who was head of the Special
Operations command, which oversees the
military's covert information
operations.
Many administration officials worried
that the United States was losing support
in the Islamic world after American
warplanes began bombing Afghanistan in
October. Those concerns spurred the
creation of the Office of Strategic
Influence.
In an interview in November, Gen.
Richard B. Myers, chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, explained the
Pentagon's desire to broaden its efforts
to influence foreign audiences,
saying:
"Perhaps the most challenging piece of
this is putting together what we call a
strategic influence campaign quickly and
with the right emphasis. That's everything
from psychological operations to the
public affairs piece to coordinating
partners in this effort with us."
One of the military units assigned to
carry out the policies of the Office of
Strategic Influence is the Army's
Psychological Operations Command. The
command was involved in dropping millions
of fliers and broadcasting scores of radio
programs into Afghanistan encouraging
Taliban and Al Qaeda soldiers to
surrender.
In the 1980's, Army "psyop" units, as
they are known, broadcast radio and
television programs into Nicaragua
intended to undermine the Sandinista
government. In the 1990's, they tried to
encourage public support for American
peacekeeping missions in the Balkans.
The Office of Strategic Influence will
also oversee private companies that will
be hired to help develop information
programs and evaluate their effectiveness
using the same techniques as American
political campaigns, including scientific
polling and focus groups, officials
said.
"O.S.I. still thinks the way to go is
start a Defense Department Voice of
America," a senior military official said.
"When I get their briefings, it's
scary."

Pentagon's Bin Laden "tape": French
TV satire spoofs US reliance on
tape | Iraqi
newspaper calls it a US fake |
Leading
German TV program reveals carnage
caused by reckless US bombing, alleges
that Pentagon forged parts of
translation of the tape | Full
transcript of programme with details of
falsification |
Bin
Laden's mother says video is
"doctored"
| Pentagon
deliberately mistranslated Osama Video
- German Press investigates, US is
silent
-
|