La
Voz de Aztlan Friday, October 12, 2001
ARE AMERICANS
THE VICTIMS OF A HOAX? THE time has come to stop using the flag as a
blindfold, to stop waving our guns and our gods at
each other, to take a close look at the facts which
have emerged from the attacks on the World Trade
Towers and to recognize the very real possibility,
indeed probability, that We The People are the
victims of a gigantic and deadly hoax. In a normal terrorist event, the terrorists
cannot wait to take credit, in order to link the
violence to the socio-political intent of the
terrorist organization. Yet the prime suspect in
the New York Towers case, ex(?) CIA asset Osama
Bin Laden (whose brother is one of George W.
Bush's Texas business partners), has issued
only two statements regarding the September 11th
attacks, and both of those are denials of any
involvement. Huge problems are emerging in the official view
of events. It's known that the United States was
planning an invasion of Afghanistan long before the
attacks on the World Trade Towers. Indeed the
attacks on the World Trade Towers perfectly fit the
timetable of an invasion by October stated by US
officials just last summer. The 19 names of suspected hijackers released by
the FBI don't point to Afghanistan. They come from
Saudi Arabia, Egypt, United Arab Emirates; all
across the middle east without a focus in any one
region. Indeed, even as the FBI was admitting that
its list of 19 names was based solely on
identifications thought to have been forged, Saudi
Arabia's Foreign Minister Prince Saud
Al-Faisal insisted that an investigation in
Saudi Arabia showed that the 5 Saudi men were not
aboard the four jetliners that crashed in New York,
Virginia and Pennsylvania on September 11. "It was
proved that five of the names included in the FBI
list had nothing to do with what happened,"
Al-Faisal told the Arabic Press in Washington after
meeting with U.S. President George W. Bush at the
White House. A sixth identified hijacker is also reported to
still be alive in Tunisia, while a 7th named man
died two years ago! In a recent development, the
BBC is reporting that the transcript of a phone
call made by Flight Attendant Madeline Amy
Sweeney to Boston air traffic controls shows
that the flight attendant gave the seat numbers
occupied by the hijackers, seat numbers which were
NOT the seats of the men the FBI claimed were
responsible for the hijacking! FBI Chief Robert Mueller admitted on
September 20 and on September 27 that at this time
the FBI has no legal proof to prove the true
identities of the suicidal hijackers. Yet in the
haste to move forward on the already planned war in
Afghanistan, our government and the FBI (which does
not have the best record for honesty in
investigations to begin with, having been caught
rigging lab tests, manufacturing testimony in the
Vincent Foster affair, and illegally
withholding/destroying evidence in the Oklahoma
Bombing case) are not taking too close a look at
evidence that points away from the designated
suspect, ex(?) CIA asset Osama Bin Laden. In particular, the FBI, too busy harassing
political dissenters to find spies in its midst,
the long rumored mole inside the White House, or
plug leaks in high-tech flowing to foreign nations,
has willfully and criminally ignored the
implications of some vital pieces of information
the FBI is itself waving around at the public. We are being told that this crack team of
terrorists, able to breeze past airport security as
if it wasn't there, wound up leaving so much
evidence in its wake that the bumbling Inspector
Clousseau (or the FBI) could not fail to
stumble over it. The locations where the terrorists
supposedly stayed are so overloaded with damning
materials that they resemble less a crimes scene,
and more a "B" detective movie set, with vital
clues always on prominent display for the cameras.
Yet another problem lies with the described actions
of the hijackers themselves. We are being told on the one hand that these men
were such fanatical devotees of their faith that
they willingly crashed the jets they were flying
into buildings. Yet on the other hand, we are being
told that these same men spent the night before
their planned visit to Allah drinking in strip
bars, committing not just one, but two mortal sins
which would keep them out of Paradise no matter
what else they did. Truly devout Muslims would spend the day before
a suicide attack fasting and praying. Not only does
the drinking in strip bars not fit the profile of a
fanatically religeous Muslim willing to die for his
cause, but the witness reports of the men in the
bars are of men going out of their way to be
noticed and remembered, while waving around phony
identifications. Because of the facts of the phony
identifications, we don't really know who was on
those planes. What we do know is that the men on those planes
went to a great deal of trouble to steal the
identities of Muslims, and to make sure those
identities were seen and remembered, then to leave
a plethora of planted clues around, such as crop
dusting manuals, and letters in checked baggage
(why does a terrorist about to die need to check
baggage?) that "somehow" didn't get on the final,
fatal, flight. Fake terror is nothing new. According to
recently released files, our government planned
Operation NORTHWOODS to
stage phony terror attacks against American
citizens in the wake of the Bay Of Pigs, to anger
Americans into support for a second invasion of
Cuba. The plan was spiked by JFK. If our
government has ever actually carried out such plans
to stage phony terror attacks, the documents have
remained classified. But given the reality of Operation
NORTHWOODS, or the manner in
which FDR manuevered Japan into attacking Pearl
Harbor, one cannot rule out the possibility that,
once again, the people of the United States are
being lied to by their own government, to
manufacture consent for a war of invasion already
being discussed with other nations the previous
summer. It is also quite possible, indeed likely,
that the United States is being spoofed by a third
party to trigger a war.
It has happened before. According to Victor
Ostrovsky, a defector from Israel's secret
service, Mossad,
Israel decided to mount a false-flag operation
designed to further discredit Libya, and provoke
the US to attack an Arab nation. A transmitter
loaded with pre-recorded messages was planted in
Tripoli, Libya, by a Mossad team. The "Trojan
Horse" beamed out fake messages about
Libyan-authorized bombings and planned attacks that
were immediately intercepted by US electronic
monitoring. Convinced by this disinformation that Libya was
behind the 1986 bombing of a Berlin disco in which
a US soldier died, President Ronald Reagan
ordered massive air attacks on Libya, including an
obvious- and illegal (under US law) attempt to
assassinate [Muhamar] Qadaffi
himself. Some 100 Libyan civilians were killed,
including Qadaffi's two year old daughter. Libyan
officials had no idea why they were attacked. It is worth remembering the motto of the Mossad
is, "By way of deception, thou shalt do war."
Whether they were involed in the attacks or not, it
cannot be doubted that Israel has benefited from
the attacks in New York. While world attention is
focuzed on what the US will do in Afghanistan,
Israel has escalated its attacks against
Palestinians towns. Israel has repeatedly tried to claim that
Palestinians were involved in the New York attacks,
hoping to bury the Palestinian cause under the
rubble of the World Trade Towers. Because of the
faked IDs and stolen identities, we don't really
know who planned the World Trade Towers attacks. We only know who they wanted us to blame. And we
know that the United States has been tricked in the
past into bombing someone who did not deserve the
attack, and that those who were bombed then
embarked on what from their point of view was
justified retaliation that culminated over
Lockerbie. And while bombs were falling and planes
were crashing, Israel was laughing at us that we
had been so easily fooled into bombing Israel's
targets for them. Are we being hoaxed again, by Israel, or by our
own government, or by both? It's impossible to rule
that out. Right now there are a lot of people who
want war. Oil companies want Afghanistan's
petroleum products. Our corporations want
"friendlier" markets. The CIA wants all that opium. And all those
war-mongers, with all their greed and agendas, will
not hesitate in the least to pour your tax dollars
and your children's blood all over Afghanistan, to
get those "friendlier" markets, oil, and opium.
Because of the vested interests at work here,
American citizens must, more than at any other time
in recent history, rely on themselves to decide
what is happening in our nation. Too many of those who purport to report the
"truth" to us are eager to grab more tax money and
more children to pour into a war of invasion,
poised at a region which has swallowed up every
army that has tried to conquer it since the time of
Alexander The Great. And one more thing. Take a good look at the map of Eurasia and plot
out where the United States has military
deployments. They march in a straight line through
the middle of Eurasia, Macedonia, Bosnia, Kosovo,
Georgia, Azerbaijan, Turkmenia, Uzbekistan,
Afghanistan. The United States is prepared to cut
the Russian Federation off from the oil rich middle
east, and to control transportation routes from
China and India into the Middle East. When Russia realizes that this is the real
agenda, that's when "Dubya Dubya Three" will really
get going! POSTSCRIPT: Looks like the cat is out of
the bag. [click]
The
above news item is reproduced without editing other
than typographical; it represents the views only of
its writer, and not necessarily of this
website
David
Irving recalls: I MUST admit that the
pre-Paradise visit to the strip club by these
"devout Muslim" hijackers had puzzled me too. As
for the bombing raid on Tripoli, when I
met
CIA chief Bill Casey at Mclean in May 1986,
I asked him about that and sugegsted that all the
clues pointed at Syria, not Libya, and that
released "NSA" transcripts of phone intercepts
published in the New York Times had mysteriously
changed in their content since first released a
month earlier. Casey smiled, as though to
acknowledge that I had spotted that, then; he
scoffed, "Syria, Libya, the American public don't
know the difference!"
|