The
Washington Report on Middle East
Affairs August/September 2001
The Ariel Sharon
Dossier NEARLY
TWO DECADES LATER, ARIEL SHARON IS
INDICTED FOR SABRA AND SHATILA WAR
CRIMES By Donald Neff FOR a terrorist,
Ariel Sharon has led a charmed life
-- at least up to now. Arik King of
Israel, as his adoring admirers call him,
may some day have to face trial in a
Belgian court on charges of war crimes,
crimes against humanity and genocide
arising from the 1982 massacres at the
Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in
Lebanon. The charges officially were filed
on June 18 before investigating judge
Sophie Huguet in Brussels and
confirmed as admissible by the Brussels
Public Prosecutor's Office on June 29. It
ruled the suit should proceed. If
Sharon actually is brought to trial it
would be a rare setback for the 73-year
old Israeli in his long and documented
career of waging terror against
Palestinians. He started out as a young
Haganah fighter causing havoc among
Palestinians seeking to protect their land
against Jewish attacks in 1947 and beyond.
He became a legend in the army in the
1950s when he led the notorious Unit 101
in terror attacks against unarmed
Palestinians, in one attack alone killing
66 civilians.[1] He fought as a
tank commander in Israel's 1956,1967 and
1973 wars, his units accompanied by
reports of brutality. In 1971, Sharon formed a special
assassination unit to combat unrest among
Palestinians living under Israeli
occupation in the Gaza Strip. Sharon's
antagonistic biographer, Uzi
Benziman, an Israeli newsman, wrote
that Sharon conducted "a reign of terror"
against Gazans:[2] "On his orders,
every adult male in Gaza was stopped and
subjected to a thorough search.
Periodically, curfews were imposed on the
refugee camps, and all residents were
assembled for hours on end for purposes of
identification. Paths through the refugee
camps were widened [by razing homes
and businesses] and the population
thinned out, to make it harder for
terrorists to find refuge:[3] "In
seven months, between July and February
1972, Sharon reported the deaths of 104
and capture of 742
terrorists.[4] Such violent feats qualified Sharon to
become Israel's defense minister in 1981.
Sharon came to his powerful post with an
ambitious plan. It was to completely
destroy the Palestine Liberation
Organization in Lebanon "in such a way
that they will not be able to rebuild
their military and political base," as he
told a group of Israeli
officers.[5] To accomplish
his goals, Sharon in 1982 invaded
Lebanon, tampered with Lebanon's
politics to assure the election of
pro-Israeli Maronite Christian
Bashir Gemayel as president, and
sought to evict the Syrian army from
Lebanon.[6] He failed in all
three objectives. The PLO remains a
viable force, Gemayel was assassinated
and the Syrians are still in Lebanon 19
years later. What is different is that
thousands of Lebanese and hundreds of
Israelis are dead. The Israeli invasion of Lebanon began
on June 6. Within a week Israeli troops
reached Beirut and launched a merciless
siege of the capital. Over the next nine
weeks, Israeli planes, ships and guns, all
of them made or financed by the United
States, lobbed thousands of aerial bombs
and 60,000 shells on the city of more than
a half-million residents, indiscriminately
killing and wounding thousands of Lebanese
and Palestinians.7 Actress Jane
Fonda proudly posed with the Israeli
troops besieging Beirut while U.S.
supporters of Israel defended the
invasion. Former Secretary of State
Henry Kissinger declared at the
time that the invasion "opens up
extraordinary opportunities for a dynamic
American diplomacy throughout the Middle
East....Lebanon can be another testing
ground for proving that radical Arab
regimes and Soviet backing offer no
solution to any of the central issues of
concern in the area."[8] The Israeli army control of the Beirut
area included two teeming Palestinian
refugee camps, Sabra and Shatila. On Sept.
16, a company of 150 "special" Lebanese
Christian Phalange fighters, who were
working closely with Sharon and who hated
the Palestinians, moved into the cramped
and twisting streets of the Shatila
Palestinian refugee camp. Darkness was
falling and Israeli mortar units and
airplanes dropped flares to aid the
Phalangists' progress.[9] The
Israelis knew the Phalangists were
bloodthirsty. They were lusting for
revenge because, only two days before,
their leader, Israeli-backed
President-elect Bashir Gemayel, had been
assassinated.[10] Now, on Sept. 16, as the massacres were
about to begin, U.S. special envoy Morris
Draper was told by Israeli Chief of Staff
Rafael Eitan that "Lebanon is at a
point of exploding into a frenzy of
revenge. No one can stop them. They're
[the Phalangists] obsessed with
the idea of revenge.[11]
Afterwards, Israeli leaders claimed they
had no idea that violence was near. Phalangists killed civilians
indiscriminately in the camps. There were
no PLO guerrillas, though Israel had
claimed there were, so the women, children
and old victims were defenseless. Whole
families were gunned down or knifed to
death. One infant was stomped to death by
a man wearing spiked shoes. Another
refugee was killed by live grenades draped
around his neck.[12] Bulldozers
were brought in, mass graves hastily dug
and truck loads of bodies dumped in them.
Throughout the night, the shooting and the
screams did not stop.[13] The
killing lasted until the morning of Sept.
18. The official Israeli commission of
inquiry into the massacres concluded that
700 to 800 persons had been killed in the
two camps.[14] Non-Israeli
estimates were considerably higher. The
Palestine Red Crescent put the number at
over 2,000, while Lebanese authorities
reported that 762 bodies were recovered
and 1,200 death certificates
issued.[15] When a
horrified world demanded an explanation
of Israeli Prime Minister Menachem
Begin, who himself had committed
indiscriminate terror in his youth, he
said without a word of regret: "Goyim
kill Goyim and they blame the
Jew.[16] A prepared cabinet
statement said: "A blood libel has been
perpetrated against the Jewish
people."[17] Despite Israel's denials of
responsibility, New York Times
correspondent Thomas L. Friedman
declared without qualification: "The
Israelis knew just what they were doing
when they let the Phalangists into those
camps."[18] Sharon and seven other Israeli
officials, including Begin, were found
guilty the next year by an Israeli
commission of "indirect responsibility"
for the massacres. Sharon was also found
to have "personal responsibility," and he
was ordered to resign or be removed as
defense minister.[19] Sharon
resigned, protesting his innocence, but he
was allowed to stay in the cabinet as a
minister without portfolio. He remained
near the center of Israeli politics in the
ensuing years. Israelis gave him the country's highest
prize in 2000 by electing him their prime
minister. Beyond losing his post as
defense minister, Sharon never received
any punishment for the massacres. In fact,
in the years since he has publicly
proclaimed his innocence, acting as though
the bloodshed was an internal Lebanese
affair. A listless world seemed to agree
with him and appeared content to forget
the massacres. The Belgian suit against Sharon is the
first serious legal attack against him --
or anyone else, including the Phalangist
killers -- for the massacres. It was
brought by 28 survivors of Sabra and
Shatila under a 1993 Belgian law that
allows prosecution of non-Belgian citizens
regardless of where or when the atrocity
occurred.[20] The Belgian suit was followed June 23
by a major human rights group calling for
a criminal investigation of Ariel Sharon's
role in the massacres. Hanny
Megally, executive director of Human
Rights Watch's Middle East and North
Africa division, said: "There is abundant
evidence that war crimes and crimes
against humanity were committed on a wide
scale in the Sabra and Shatila massacre,
but to date, not a single individual has
been brought to justice." He added: "'The Israeli government ...has a
responsibility to conduct an investigation
into the actions of its own high officials
who knew ...that atrocities were likely to
occur and did not act promptly to stop
them once they knew the killing had
started.[21] These actions came after a June 17
showing by the BBC of a documentary on the
massacres that examined the question of
whether Sharon should be put on trial for
war crimes. Several persons in the program
suggested Sharon should be charged. One
was then-U.S. envoy Draper, who
flatly said Sharon should have anticipated
the massacres, adding: "You'd have to be
appallingly ignorant not to expect a
bloodbath. I mean, I suppose if you came
down from the moon that day, you might not
predict it."[22] Israel's Foreign Ministry condemned the
documentary as "distorted, unfair and
intentionally hostile." Raanan Gissin, a
spokesman for Sharon, said: "There's
anti-Semitism, there's deception, there's
malice -- all put in one show with a
sinister intent."[23] The Israeli condemnations of the BBC
program almost sounded like Begin's old
complaint that "Goyim kill Goyim and they
blame the Jew." The difference this time
is that Ariel Sharon is officially charged
in a court of law. If the Belgians do not
buckle under Zionist pressure, he may
finally some day have to account for his
bloody actions in Sabra and Shatila. FOOTNOTES: - 1 Donald
Neff, Warriors at Suez,* p.
49.
- 2 Uzi
Benziman, Sharon, p. 118.
- 3 Ibid., pp.
115-16.
- 4 Ariel.
Sharon, Warrior, p. 260.
- 5 Ze'ev
Schiff & Ehud Ya'ari, Israel's
Lebanon War,* p. 42.
- 6 lbid., p.
43.
- 7 George
Ball, Error and Betrayal in Lebanon, p.
44.
- 8 Washington
Post, 6/16/82.
- 9 "Final
Report of the Israeli Commission of
Inquiry into the Events at
the
- Refugee Camps
in Beirut," Journal of Palestine
Studies, Vol. XII, No. 3,
- Spring 1983,
pp. 93-94.
- 10 Schiff
& Ya'ari, p. 259.
- 11 Ibid., pp.
259-60.
- 12 Ibid.,p.
264.
- 13 Time,
10/4/82, p. 22.
- 14 Journal of
Palestine Studies, p. 105.
- 15 Ball, p.
57. the Lebanese government reported by
Jack Redden of United
- Press
International on 10/13/82. Also
see
- Carol
Collins, "Chronology of the Israeli War
in Lebanon," Journal
- of Palestine
Studies, No. 2, Winter 1983, p.
116.
- 16 Eric
Silver, Begin, p. 236.
- 17 Ball, p.
58.
- 18 Friedman,
Thomas, From Beirut to Jerusalem,*
164-65.
- 19 Excerpts
in New York Times, 2/9/83, and in
"Final Report of the
Israeli
- Commission of
Inquiry," Journal of Palestine Studies,
Vol. XII, No. 3.
- Spring 1983,
pp. 89-116.
- 20 Lee
Hockstader, Washington Post,
6/25/2001.
- 21
Ibid.
- 22
Ibid.
- 23
Ibid.
AN
ISRAELI BESTIARY: DEHUMANIZING
PALESTINIANS ISRAEL'S TOURISM
MINISTER Rehavam Zeevi's
description of Palestinians as "lice" on
Israeli radio on July 2 is only the latest
slur by Israeli officials to compare
Palestinians to animals and insects. In
his words, Zeevi said Palestinians were
living illegally in Israel and "We should
get rid of the ones who are not Israeli
citizens the same way you get rid of lice.
We have to stop this cancer from spreading
within us."[1] Such malicious attacks are an old
Zionist ploy. They are an effort to
dehumanize the Palestinians and thereby
their legitimate claim to Palestine. Other
examples: On June 2,1982, Prime Minister
Menachem Begin said in the Knesset in
reference to what he called Palestinian
terrorism that "if the hand of a
two-legged animal is raised against
[Jewish children] it will be
severed."[2] The next year, on April 13,
Raphael Eitan, Israel's military
chief of staff, applauded plans to
increase Jewish settlements in the
occupied territories, saying: "When we
have settled the land, all the Arabs will
be able to do about it will be scurry
around like drugged roaches in a
bottle."[3] Last year, on Aug. 28, Prime
Minister Ehud Barak opposed
withdrawal from Israeli occupied territory
by likening Palestinians to crocodiles,
saying "the more you feed them the more
they want."[4] Though Israelis are liberal in
bestowing epithets on Palestinians, they
themselves are ever-so-sensitive to being
called names. Member of Knesset Collette
Avital introduced a bill in the Knesset to
ban the use of 68 words during debates.
Among these offensive appellations were
animals, swamp fly, leech, reptile,
monster and poodle.[5] -D.N. - 1 Washington Post, 7/3/01.
- 2 Jansen, The Battle of Beirut,
p.126; Zeev and Yaari, Israel's
Lebanon
- War, p. 218.
- 3 New York Times, 4/14/83, and
David K. Shipler, Arab and Jew,
p.235.
- 4 Reuters, 8/29/2000.
- 5 Seattle Times, 6/22/01.
Donald Neff is the author of the
Warriors trilogy and 50 Years of Israel,
available from the AET Book Club, and of
Fallen Pillars: U.S. Policy Towards
Palestine and Israel since 1945.
Related items on this website: -
Sharon halts
Belgian visit fearing war crime
arrest.
-
UN
draft: Zionism 'a movement based on
racial superiority'
|