 January 28, 2001 [Pictures added
by this website] Sounds of
Silence A
Holocaust historian examines the challenge
of writing about the Nazi
genocide. By
MORRIS DICKSTEIN
RETHINKING
THE HOLOCAUST By Yehuda Bauer. 335 pp. New Haven: Yale University
Press. $29.95. IN THE passionate debates about the
Holocaust over the last three decades,
which shattered the near-silence of the
postwar years, some striking differences
have emerged. Many writers take their
inspiration from Theodor Adorno's
dictum that to write poetry after
Auschwitz is barbaric. They are convinced
that the enormity of the Holocaust opened
up a rift in human consciousness that
cannot be bridged by conventional forms of
discourse. The challenge of writing about
mass extermination, according to the
historian Dan Diner, comes from
"the inconceivability, the basic
unimaginability of the event itself."
Writers, critics and historians as unlike
each other as Elie
Wiesel, Geoffrey Hartman,
Dominick LaCapra, Lawrence
Langer and Saul
Friedländer have probed the
boundaries between history and memory,
witness and objective narration. They look
to safeguard the subject from kitsch and
normalization, arguing that such
unspeakable events test the limits of our
ability to represent them. On the other hand, most historians (and
many survivors) have simply labored to
reconstruct and explain what actually
happened, to shed light in darkness,
something that the perpetrators, by
covering their traces and eliminating
nearly all witnesses, tried to make sure
would never be done. Heinrich
Himmler, in his notorious speech
to SS officers in Poznan in 1943,
congratulated them on remaining "decent"
in the face of a mountain of corpses,
adding: "This is a glorious page in our
history which has never been written and
never will be written." Events
that followed, beginning with the
Nuremberg trials in November 1945, proved
him wrong. In its wealth of documentary
detail, Raul
Hilberg's
(left)
"Destruction of the European Jews" (1961)
did much to clarify how the Holocaust was
physically organized. His operational
approach strongly influenced nine-hour
documentary film "Shoah." Another
respected and authoritative figure in the
field is Yehuda Bauer, the former
research director of Yad Vashem and a
retired professor of Holocaust studies at
the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. His
eloquent new book, "Rethinking the
Holocaust," recast and rewritten from
separate essays and lectures, is an
eye-opening synthesis of the whole
historiography of the Shoah. Bauer's writing, like Hilberg's, is
stringently matter-of-fact, altogether
free of the fear and trembling of those
who approach the subject in the spirit of
Adorno or Wiesel. To him their qualms
about whether the Holocaust can be
described or explained smack of a "retreat
into mysticism."+ "If we label the
Holocaust as inexplicable," he insists,
"it becomes relevant to lamentations and
liturgy, but not to historical analysis."
He maintains that "the murder was
committed by humans for reasons whose
sources are found in history and which can
therefore be rationally analyzed." Instead
of asking whether the Holocaust was
unique, which could be seen as a
metaphysical question, he compares it to
other genocidal projects and points to
factors that made it "unprecedented." The
Germans, for example, subjected Jews to a
degrading regimen of shame, humiliation
and loss of identity, even depriving them
of "control over their bodily functions"
before actually killing them. He finds it
deeply troubling that no Nazi document has
come to light ordaining this "systematic
humiliation." This reveals how much it
simply emerged from the logic of the whole
system.
BOOK
EXCERPT"Just
as the murder of the Jews was
not inevitable, it was not
inexplicable . . .
[T]he inclination of
people who take refuge in
mysticism to argue that an
event of such magnitude -- a
'tremendum,' as they sometimes
call it -- cannot ultimately
be explained. This retreat
into mysticism is usually
reserved for the Holocaust,
whereas all other events are
deemed liable to rational
explanation. I am afraid I
cannot accept that exception
to the rule. The murder was
committed by humans for
reasons whose sources are
found in history and which can
therefore be rationally
analyzed. The mystifiers, with
the best of intentions,
achieve the opposite of their
presumed aim, which is to
achieve identification and
empathy with the victims. You
cannot identify with what is
inexplicable. True, the depth
of pain and suffering of
Holocaust victims is difficult
to describe, and writers,
artists, poets, dramatists,
and philosophers will forever
grapple with the problem of
articulating it -- and as far
as this is concerned, the
Holocaust is certainly not
unique, because
'indescribable' human
suffering is forever there and
is forever being described. In
principle, then, the Holocaust
is a human event, so it can be
explained, because it was
perpetrated for what were
unfortunately human reasons.
This does not mean that the
explanation is easy. On the
contrary." --
from the first
chapter
of 'Rethinking the
Holocaust' |
Bauer's book has its debunking side,
aimed at the "mystification" not only of
literary interpreters but of Orthodox
religious thinkers like the Lubavitcher
Rebbe Menachem Mendel Schneerson, who
compared the Holocaust to a surgical
amputation resulting from the sins of the
Jews past and present. Here Bauer's
customary empathy fails him. As a secular
humanist he adopts a tone of light
sarcasm, wondering indignantly whether God
is really more concerned about what Jews
eat for lunch than about the death of a
million children. He applies the same
skepticism to social scientists like
Zygmunt Bauman, who invoke murky
concepts like modernity to explain the
Holocaust, and Daniel
Jonah Goldhagen, whose notion of a
special German brand of "eliminationist
anti-Semitism" he finds too crude and
indiscriminate to explain anything.
Bauer's critique of Goldhagen inspires
some of his best writing, since he himself
insists that anti-Semitism provided the
ideological "push" that, combined with
Hitler's fanaticism, the enthusiastic
embrace of the bureaucracy and
professional elites and the milder but not
yet murderous prejudices of the broad
German public, made the Holocaust
possible. But where most historians, including
Hilberg, see the Holocaust from the angle
of the Germans, who conceived and executed
it, Bauer, as an Israeli, is determined to
integrate the perspective of the Jews,
whom he portrays not simply as victims or
objects of persecution but as living
principals with ever diminishing choices
as Eastern Europe turned into a vast
prison-house after 1941. The meat of the
book is a brilliant review of vexed issues
like Jewish resistance (armed and
unarmed), the role of the Judenräte,
or Nazi-imposed Jewish Councils, and the
plans to rescue Jews by buying their
freedom or alerting them to what awaited
them if they boarded the trains for
Auschwitz.
Undercutting tenacious assumptions about
Jewish passivity or cooperation, Bauer
surveys the widely different conditions
from ghetto to ghetto, from council to
council, showing us how the Jews behaved
in the face of whatever options remained
to them. He neither exaggerates nor
dismisses the degree of resistance, but
extends the concept of resistance to other
forms of opposition, including superhuman
efforts to build up morale and sustain
traces of normal life. Responding to bitter recriminations
that more could have been done to alert
Hungarian Jews, the last surviving
community in Eastern Europe, to what was
in store for them if they were deported,
Bauer, in a rare recourse to metaphor,
shows how both ordinary Jews and their
communal leaders "were caught on an island
in shark-infested waters, and they had no
boat. If the island was flooded, they were
doomed. Most people reacted, therefore, by
closing their eyes to the dangers." He
usefully distinguishes between
"information" about the camps, which had
been leaking out for years, and any real
"knowledge" or understanding of them, and
he is viscerally offended by the idea of
blaming the victims for their own fate.
This is not simply a form of apologetics.
Bauer maintains that historians must
recreate the real choices available to
people, including the limits on those
choices, and he likes to remind us that
what happened didn't always have to
happen, for things might have turned out
differently. Had the Russians arrived a
little sooner, he says, the Lodz ghetto
might have been saved, and its dictatorial
leader, Chaim Rumkowski, seen as a
savior rather than a power-mad
collaborator. In one of his many superb chapter
summations, Bauer conveys the "nearly
total helplessness" of Jews during the
war, including Jews in other countries,
like the United States, who could do
little to intervene. Most rescue efforts
failed, as nearly all forms of resistance
failed, "not because those who tried were
bunglers but because they lived in dire
and desperate times, times that their
detractors have no inner understanding
of." With the skill of a sleuth and the
assiduous patience of a born scholar,
Bauer reconstructs the schemes, characters
and motives in a spirit of factual
inquiry, keen empathy and, of all unlikely
things, common sense. "In this book I do
not memorialize the Holocaust," he says.
"I ask questions about what happened and
why." Bauer's empirical cast of mind
cannot tell us all we want to know. It
resists speculative flights and avoids the
dark corners that only intuition or art
can fathom. He loves quoting Hilberg to
the effect that "we historians are in the
truth business." Impatient with the
scruples of postmodern skepticism, which
reminds us of the limits of our knowledge,
Bauer
in "Rethinking the Holocaust" makes a
strong case for the tact and insight of
the historical imagination as it confronts
the unimaginable. Morris
Dickstein is distinguished professor of
English at the City University of New
York. His study of postwar fiction,
"Leopards in the Temple," will be
published later this year. above: Elie Wiesel Related links:
First
Chapter: 'Rethinking the
Holocaust'
Raul
Hilberg index
Elie
Wiesel index
|