New York, September 8, 2000
A Case of
Self-Promotion? Prominent
Holocaust Claims Lawyer Accused of
Neglecting Clients Lawyer
Ed Fagan recruited as clients some
82,000 Holocaust victims or family
members, to help them press compensation
claims for Jewish money hidden by Swiss
banks and slave labor work for German
companies. (ABCNEWS.com) By Brian Ross
Sept. 8 -- A lawyer who prominently
recruited thousands of Holocaust survivors
or their families in compensation claims
against German companies and Swiss banks
now is being accused of neglecting some of
his clients, ABCNEWS' 20/20 reports
tonight. His name is Ed Fagan, and
in the past few years, he has traveled the
world recruiting as clients some 82,000
Holocaust survivors who were horribly
abused, forced into slave labor or who
lost their family property and bank
accounts. Dozens of lawyers are involved
but Fagan has made himself the public face
of the so-called Holocaust lawsuits
brought against Swiss banks and German
companies. He's been widely quoted in
hundreds of articles and featured on
television around the world. Yet even as
Fagan was signing the final documents in
Berlin in a settlement that would give $5
billion to slave labor victims, a joint
investigation by 20/20 and The New York
Times found serious questions being
raised about this so-called savior, now
accused of ignoring and neglecting some of
the very clients he had promised to
help. Answering Machine
Messages Out of the public eye, says Jane
Warshaw, who worked for Fagan and a
former partner as a paralegal for several
months last year, the lawyers paid little
attention to their clients' pleas. A tape
of telephone messages left on the
answering machine at Fagan's law office
was provided to 20/20 and the New York
Times. "And if they wrote in, it
didn't help," she says. "There was
unopened mail sitting on top of the desk
on the chairs, everywhere." She says she
felt compelled to blow the whistle on
Fagan and his partner in this letter to
the federal judge overseeing the Swiss
bank case. Fagan, who admits he hired
almost no office help, says he was too
busy traveling and working on the cases to
answer all the questions from his
thousands of clients. But legal experts
say that is no excuse. Legal Ethics
"It does not pass legal ethics for the
lawyer to ignore questions simply because
there are so many clients," says New York
University law professor Stephen
Gillers. 20/20 played some of the tape
for Gillers, a leading authority on legal
ethics, who says Fagan should have made
sure someone responded to his clients.
Gillers says Fagan had a special
responsibility given what the Holocaust
clients had been through. "Elderly people
who have been through hell and back, that
population has to be recognized as
deserving special care and solicitude," he
said. "A lawyer who receives that call has
to stop and say to himself, my God, I'm
doing something wrong here if I have even
one of those calls. Let alone three or
four or five," said Gillers. But it turns
out that even after Fagan learned of the
messages recorded by his former paralegal
he had never bothered to listen to all of
them until 20/20 played him the tape.
"That's the first I heard that tape," said
Fagan. "Four years of our lives we spent
on these cases, is it perfect? No. Should
we give the people phone calls? Yes," he
said. A Missed Deadline
Fagan's behavior may not affect the
claims of most of his clients, but it was
a serious problem for one family. With
their daughter Bella, Sam and
Lola Rothkopf went to Fagan because
they believed their family had lost
thousands in a Swiss bank account when the
family fled the Nazis. Fagan seemed
perfect. "There was no other name that was
associated with this issue that regularly
was there other than Ed Fagan," said Bella
Ross. But the Rothkopfs say once they
signed up with Fagan and made the decision
to relive so many painful memories,
turning over family records to try to
prove their connection to the missing bank
account, they never heard from him or saw
their records again. They've now learned
Fagan missed the deadline for submitting
documents to support the claim, never
filed the documents to back up their
claim, which the Swiss Bank Commission has
denied, awarding the disputed account to
someone else. "And he knew what we went
through and everything and he has, this
what he did is terrible. A terrible
thing," said Lola Rothkopf. Earlier this
year, the Rothkopfs took their complaint
about Fagan's failure to return their
calls to the New York State Bar
Association, which declined to take any
action against him. Ed Fagan responds,
"Are there people out there that say . . .
that the manner in which the cases were
handled from an administrative standpoint
were not good? Were inappropriate? Yes."
But, he adds, "I handled my
obligations." Others Complain
But the Rothkopfs are not alone in
feeling abandoned by Fagan. ABCNEWS found
a number of Holocaust survivors and family
members who signed up with Fagan and now
claim he virtually ignored them when they
simply tried to find out the status of
their claims or if their claims were even
part of the lawsuit. "And I was
persistent. I called, I sent faxes,
e-mail, everything," says Dr. Reuven
Ofir. "I still don't know, is he
legitimate? Is he going to do anything? Or
is he not going to do anything," asks
Minnie Kramer. Professor Gillers
says, based on what 20/20 told him it had
found, it's a serious problem. "This is a
law office out of control, in my view.
This is client abuse, in my view, and it
should not be allowed to continue," he
says. Abandoned, Neglected
Clients But it's not the first time Fagan has
been accused of neglecting his clients.
Just five years ago, he was deeply in
debt, placing ads in the New York yellow
pages seeking clients for personal injury
lawsuits. A search of courthouse records
and interviews by Barry Meier of
The New York Times found five
different cases in which Fagan appeared to
have abandoned or neglected existing
clients as he went after the higher
profile, higher-fee Holocaust clients. One
of them left behind, a truck driver
seriously injured in an accident in 1992.
"He was unaware until I told him a few
weeks ago that his $35 million lawsuit in
federal court had been thrown out. He said
that he had been trying to call Mr. Fagan
for two and a half years and had not
received a phone call back from him," said
Meier. Fagan disputes that. But at the
same time Fagan was living the good life,
traveling Europe, preparing to ask for
millions of dollars in fees for handling
the Holocaust cases. "I know for a fact
that the majority of these cases wouldn't
have happened without me. That's not,
that's not from bravado, it's just a
fact," said Fagan. 'We Worked Around Him'
But other lawyers in the case say that
is simply untrue. "We essentially worked
around him," says New York University law
professor Burt Neuborne. "I mean,
he was, he was there, but, but he played,
if I tell you zero, I mean zero role in
developing the legal theory, in presenting
the legal theory, and in participating as
a lawyer," says Neuborne. Neuborne, a
leading human rights lawyer who was
originally brought into the case by Fagan,
says it's time to set the record straight.
"This is the first time, I am speaking
publicly about this. But now that the
cases are over, I think it is appropriate
to, to tell the truth about him. One
hundred percent of his activity in this
case, including the press activity, it was
designed to get his name there so other
people would sign up with him, so he could
get more and more and more and more people
in the fold and then show up in court and
say 'I am to the top lawyer cause I have
got the most clients,'" says Neuborne.
"He, he certainly doesn't know my ability
as far as what I can do as a lawyer,"
counters Fagan. Large Number of Clients
"What did he attack, the number of
clients? There wouldn't be cases. The
cases wouldn't have been as powerful if we
didn't have 82,000 clients," says Fagan.
Fagan now says he's improved
communications with his clients and
provided us with a list of clients, rabbis
and family friends who vouched for him.
"Because he's a good Jew and he's a
compassionate person," says Alice
Fisher of New York City. Fisher is one
of Fagan's most prominent clients, often
appearing in public with him. She says she
trusts Fagan and he always returns her
phone calls. " I think he is a very good,
a very effective lawyer. I don't know why
you have to ask this," says Fisher. "If he
does not have a staff and so many clients
he cannot call back everybody." Final
Outrage
For many, the final outrage from Fagan
came this summer, in Berlin, when he held
up the final formal signing of the German
slave labor settlement, in part because of
a dispute over how many millions would be
given to the lawyers. With several hundred
people and top German and American
officials waiting in the next room, Fagan,
still wearing a 20/20 microphone, could be
heard haggling over the fees, and then
boasting of his success to first one
lawyer. "I got the legal fees up," he
said. And then to another lawyer, he said,
"We did great, we did great we just got
another, we just got some more money." "It
didn't surprise me at the last minute that
the only lawyer, the only lawyer that
thought he could hold this deal up would
be Ed Fagan. Because that's the barometer
of how much you care about yourself, and
how much you care about those victims,"
says Neuborne. "How could somebody with
such high ideals step on them and step on
the people involved. Just to champion
himself, for a paycheck? There are lots of
other ways to make money, not to take
advantage of people who suffered," says
Bella Ross. Related story on this website
Lawyer in
Holocaust Case Faces Litany of
Complaints |