Surely
the doomed hijackers are heard to
utter more than one wild last
shout of 'Allah Akhbar!' as,
according to the FBI version,
they steer their plane at full
throttle into the
ground? |
Tuesday,
September 25, 2001 (Orlando, Florida, USA) AFTER a very leisurely drive down I-95,
adhering to the speed limit all the way, I
arrive at [...] Bookstore at
Orlando at 3 pm where we are to have the
book signing and dinner this evening, and
have lunch -- tomato and basil soup, and
curried chicken. President Bush has formally
rehoisted the U.S. flag from half-mast,
and the wave of patriotism is receding. At
the service areas I notice rather more men
in camouflage uniform than usual. So
President George W Bush is off to the
wars: or rather his young men are. At
least they will have an enemy terrain over
which the costly Stealth bombers and
fighters can still operate with a degree
of safety. Thanks to the radio "mush"
generated by billions of cellphones above
civilised European countries ("Yeah! Hi!
I'm in the cinema!") the Stealth planes
are no longer invisible to radar. But
cellphones are rather thinner on the
ground in Afghanistan (at least the
Taliban does not seem to encourage their
use), and all the bombers need is an
identifiable enemy. Causing just
collateral damage is not enough. Some of the legislators are manifestly
uneasy about this lack of a proper enemy.
Colin Powell, a statesman
reminiscent of Nelson Mandela with
his wisdom and maturity, promised
yesterday to reveal the evidence they have
that puts the blame on Osama bin
Laden, only to be slapped down by Bush
who now says that (unspecified) security
considerations prevent this disclosure.
Ho-hum. Those who want to believe that, no
doubt will.
I MAINTAIN my own sharper focus on
that crater at Shanksville, in
Pennsylvania, and what really brought down
the United Airlines Flight 93. Two days
ago the FBI confirmed that the voice
recorder has been recovered intact, and
there are leaked reports that the
recording has sounds of a scuffle, and the
pilot shouting twice "Get out of the
cockpit." There are however nagging elements of
uncertainty -- whether this is from the
(airborne) cockpit voice recorder or, as
some papers have it, a recording made by
air traffic control on the ground, as the
pilot left his microphone open, and these
elements suggest that we are perhaps being
duped. It is a pity to squelch a heroic story
-- the passengers attempting to overpower
the hijackers, Tod Beemer, who
shouts "Let's roll!", a Mr Glick
saying his farewells to his wife, and the
rest. A true story like this is badly
needed to bolster the morale of a country
shocked and dispirited by the highly
visible failure of its expensive
Intelligence services. We can understand why Washington will
not for a long time concede that the
United 767 along with Messrs Beemer,
Glick, and the other 42 passengers and
crew has been shot out of the skies by an
F16 on George W Bush's orders, if that is
what happened. It is clear that three passengers said
in cell phone calls to the ground that
they were about to jump the hijackers; but
there is sufficient evidence for sceptics
to doubt the rest. One passenger, phoning
from the lavatory, said that the plane had
been hijacked; the dispatcher (on the
ground) heard an explosion in his
headphones, then the line went dead. The
tape has been seized, we have heard
nothing of any "explosion" since then. Trying to explain that bang, perhaps,
early FBI reports described how Flight 93
passengers had made cell phone calls to
relatives describing a bomb strapped to
one hijacker. Today the FBI announces that
they have found no evidence of any such
bomb, and Agent Bill Crowley also
declares they have found no evidence that
the plane broke up before it hit the
ground -- a strange denial, perhaps, in
the circumstances (particularly since a
fragment was reported to have been found
eight miles away). Crowley has also refused to disclose
information on the evidence from the
flight data recorder and cockpit voice
recorder: Why has no transcript of the
cockpit voice tape been released? There
may be some innocent explanation. The FBI
says that voices shouting in English and
Arabic are heard, but they offer neither
any transcript or translation. Surely the
doomed hijackers are heard to utter more
than one wild last shout of "Allah
Akhbar!" as, according to the FBI version,
they steer their plane at full throttle
into the ground? If they remained grimly silent, why
does the FBI not say so?
COME to that, why has no newspaper
or U.S. government official reminded us of
the
case, in 1999, of the Egyptair flight
990 which had just taken off with a
full passenger load from New York, whose
Arab pilot unaccountably rode it straight
into the Atlantic (murmuring, as the voice
recorder revealed, prayers and
imprecations to Allah as he did so)? Are
there really no similar features that need
investigation? Was the Egyptair pilot
perhaps conducting a trial run, and
decided only when airborne not to go
through with the mission against a US
target? Previous
diary
Sept
13: CNN first reports Pennsylvania crash
debris found 8 miles away |