The
twenty uninvited guests were all
masked in such items of black
woollen headgear despite the warm
summer evening. 'Balaclava,' I
inform
her. |
Thursday,
January 17, 2002 (London, England) I SPEND all afternoon in the Public
Record Office looking for the intercept
that Peter Witte has found. The
computer guide tells me there is a lot
more stuff about me, secret government
inquiries and so on, and Lord Justice
Phillimore's fury at my remarks about
his curious post-war role in Nuremberg,
the Last Battle, and his
1970 threat to sue me (he did not). I
don't have time today to look into those
files themselves though. Life moves
on. As for the intercept, not much luck in
volume HW16/37 -- the correct one, judging
by the month
[IT
WAS NOT THE CORRECT ONE]. The
telegrams decoded by Bletchley Park are
the usual mixture of watch-notices for
deserters, missing persons, spare parts
needed for motor vehicles, gearboxes,
people requesting leave because sons or
parents have died or been killed in
action, requests for special coffee,
cigarette, and alcohol allowances for
Julfest, minor reports on
skirmishes with guerrillas, 2 to 5 killed
here and there, promotions, awards, and
commendations. Most of the intercepted
traffic is eastern front, but there are a
few with Saarbrücken, Prague and
other cities -- a training course for dog
handlers, the escape of half a dozen
British prisoners, being hunted down by
the Graudenz police, and damage reported
to individual buildings in air raids. Telegrams report things like Mutter
und Kind gesund (i.e., birth news), or
the execution of seven hostages on the
orders of the military commander in Serbia
on Christmas Day, 1942 at Krusevac as a
reprisal -- nothing much has changed
there. Further
messages report the needs for sets of
uniforms, queries about the proper sizes
of flags on motor cars, thefts of motor
vehicles. There is a timely hint on
January 6, 1943 to all police signals
units, "On January 6, 1929 Heinrich
Himmler became Reichsführer SS." Sometimes, though only very rarely, the
signals are more ominous, and even then
not on any significant scale on the
Holocaust mega-barometer: the Gestapo (SD)
unit at Bragin behind the eastern front
reports on December 31, 1942 to
headquarters that Taskforce
(Sonderkommando) Bragin has
sonderbehandelt ("given special
treatment to") 83 people, making a total
of 581 people checked out so far, of whom
they had sonderbehandelt 355: "The
Aktion continues." One guesses that the 355 unfortunates
were not being nominated for any kind of
Oscars; more likely the kind of thing the
Americans and those nice Northern Allies
of theirs did to their captives last month
in the fort at Mazar i Sharif. On January 18, 1943 there is a further
intercept, originating from the same unit,
reporting that of 853 checked they have
now sonderbehandelt 614. Most of
the telegrams are Kleinkram, small
beer in comparison: on January 12, the
only item reported by Police Battalion 102
to its headqurters in Minsk was: "On
January 11, 1943 one Jewess shot at
Ko.i.ny. Nothing else to report." And
Taskforce Binder also reports proudly in
one signal, "One bandit shot." There is only one high-level signal
found in this volume, which is of around
1,300 pages containing 10,000 signals: on
February 9, 1943 Himmler signals to the
despicable Nazi mass murderer SS
General Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski
(one of the primary sources relied upon by
Lipstadt's "star witness" Prof Richard
Evans): "Dear Bach, Gauleiter
Sauckel [Hitler's manpower
plenipotentiary] wanted all men
picked up in the anti-partisan
operation and destined for
concentration camps to be diverted to
the manpower pool. I am not able to
approve this request. But I do consider
it proper to provide non-partisan
suspects to the gauleiter by evacuating
at best entire regions of White
Ruthenia. Secret! -- H Himmler." Of further interest are also the
regular (almost daily) reports by the
commanding SS general in Serbia to
Himmler, reporting sabotage, arrests,
kidnaps, murder of Serbs, military
operations, and partisan casualties. The
statistics are all again very modest,
entirely single figures. No trace of the Hofle intercept yet,
and I must have another look. Friday,
January 18, 2002 (London, England) UP at 7:45 a.m., I take our little girl
to school. One of life's minor treats.
"Daddy, what is it," she asks, "I can't
think of the name: It begins with a B,
it's like 'barracuda' but you wear it over
your head with slits for your eyes." My mind flicks back to the twenty thugs
with baseball bats -- Irv
Rubin's gang later claimed
the credit -- who smashed up my private
dinner function in Chicago a year ago,
attended by three professors and forty
other friends; the uninvited guests were
all masked in such items of black woollen
headgear despite the warm summer
evening. "Balaclava," I inform her, and there is
just time to tell her about the famous
battle -- the one in the Crimea -- as we
get to the school steps.
Today's Jewish Chronicle
front-pages a long and angry rant about my
forthcoming visit to Nottingham
University. Their correspondent Bernard
Josephs, who strikes me as being one
of the nicer kind of Jews (and God knows,
the world has inflicted enough of the
uglier kind on me), phoned me briefly a
few days ago, and I gave him a "no
comment." I
could have remarked to him that I have
been invited to speak at several other
universities and public schools over the
coming weeks, but why spoil his lunch? I
did ask him "Who told you that?" which
evinced just a silent smirk (I
presume). After I put the phone down on him --
friendly enough -- I reflected that there
is a passage in the Hitler files that I
collected, perhaps in the Walther
Hewel diaries or in the table talk, in
which Hitler, seeking to rationalise his
actions in cruelly interning large numbers
of Jews during the war, explained that
"they are the medium through which
intelligence is disseminated with the
speed of the winds, from one corner to the
other," or some such wording. It does indeed seem that there is
invariably a snitch in the organisations
that invite me: barely have I been invited
to speak at the Oxford Union or Harvard
(in that case it was Daniel
Goldhagen's father), or Cork, or
Dublin, or wherever, than somebody puts in
a phone call to the Board
of Deputies, or the Jewish
Chronicle, or some band of loutish
brothers, with the intention of preventing
me from lecturing to a willing and
interested audience. "What us?" they meanwhile proclaim,
with an air of injured innocence: "Enemies
of free speech?" Later, many of these harmless snitches
grow up into adulthood to become something
more sinister, hired spies who betray the
very country that gave them or their
parents shelter, as witness the Julius
and Ethel Rosenbergs, the
Jonathan
Pollards, the Klaus
Fuchses, the Krogers (real
name, Cohen), the George
Blakes (real name, I forget), and
so on. 10:00 AM The Scotsman phones:
they will be paying my article fee after
all, and ask which bank account.
Threatening letters work wonders. 10:15 AM a postal courier brings
a
letter from a Mr Bruce Rundle of the
local Australian High Commission. I sense
that the Australian
government is now in difficulties, and
is still seeking grounds to exclude me.
The letter includes old canards like lying
to the Canadian immigration adjudicator,
and lying to the British judge who ordered
my release from Pentonville
in 1994: both are absolutely untrue, as I
am well aware of the penalties for
perjury. (Richard
Evans, Robert
Van Pelt, etc., seem not to
be). I will get out a reply to the
Australians in the next day or two, after
taking legal advice. I suspect that the
final hurdle they will put up is the
A$35,000 costs. Altogether an interesting
day. [Previous
Radical's Diary] |