If
I were to create a new identity
for myself, it would not be as an
Israeli. I would make out that I
was a distant relative of Mother
Teresa, God rest her soul, and
that I was carrying out a secret
legacy for Albert Schweitzer, may
his bones rest in
peace. |
Sunday,
December 2, 2001 (Key West, Florida, USA) TWO nights ago I phoned Walt M.
in Philadelphia, as I had heard rumors
that he had had problems with the Kempner
collection since I visited
him. He has sent me copies of the main
items, including the long missing,
handwritten 1941 war diary of the Nazi
High Command's Sonderstab Oldenburg.
I had in the meantime written to
various universities in Germany and the
USA about this priceless collection, the
residue of the collection of wartime Nazi
documents which he had rescued from a
dumpster outside the late Robert M W
Kempner's home; and I had concluded
after discussion that it should properly
go eventually to the US Holocaust Memorial
Museum (USHMM) archives with the rest of
the Kempner papers. The USHMM officials who had scavenged
through the Kempner home last year, in
line with his testament, had overlooked
these papers; the papers had legally been
acquired by M, an antique-dealer, who
makes a living from purchasing the
secondary rights to clean out people's
homes, and sorting the wheat from the
chaff. Before
I saw him and inventoried these fifteen
footlockers full of files, the USHMM had
also visited him in the person of a Dr
Meyer; and there had been talk between
them of paying M around two million
dollars for his historic windfall. That
was the figure mentioned -- Meyer had
said, "I don't see any problem there," --
but I had warned M that this figure was
unrealistic, particularly as the diaries
of Alfred Rosenberg (left) are
seemingly still missing. Soon after my visit in mid September,
says M, a few weeks ago, he was visited
again by a top Jewish archive official
from the US Holocaust museum, and they
agreed, after inspecting what he had, on a
handshake, to pay him a purchase price of
150,000 dollars. For a few days he heard no more but
then, so M confirms on the phone to me,
last week the story took an unexpected
turn. He was visited by an agent from the
Philadelphia FBI. The agent declared the
whole collection confiscated, and removed
it from his home. He seems to have been in cohorts with
the USHMM, because the announced intention
now was to turn these files -- although
they are still legally M's property --
over to the US Holocaust Museum for no
reward whatever; but M seems to be made of
sterner stuff, and he has forced a hearing
before a federal judge next month, to
confirm that he is legally entitled to the
papers, having purchased them after the
USHMM missed out. He has wisely made
several copies of his purchase receipt, in
case it "goes missing". Phoning M, I fear that he will curse
the Jews for their underhand ways and
wiles, but he does not. He seems confident
that in the long run he will win, though
he reflects ruefully that now he is being
forced to pay for expensive lawyers -- the
kind of cash which his opponents of course
can afford much more easily than he. I know the feeling.
AROUND the world, they have a reputation,
brought upon them by the actions of a few,
which they must find hard to live down. No
sooner do their community leaders achieve
minor successes, like having the archaic
verb "to jew" removed from printed
dictionaries, than something else arises
to cause these sensitive folks
offence. Every
time I drive down the Florida Keys, I
wonder how long it will be before that
nice Mr Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation
League (friend and benefactor
of billionaire tax-fraudster Marc
Rich) succeeds in getting Jewfish
Creek renamed to something else. Look for it the next time you drive
down the Overseas Highway, Mr Foxman --
the bridge comes just after a yellow
traffic sign reading
CROCODILES CROSSING NEXT 8
MILES; but that is a sign that
casual visitors like you will see only
when you are heading back north,
and not as you are driving south down into
the Keys. The reputation of the Israelis is even
less appetising right now than that of
Captain Hook, what with having that nice
philanthropist Mr Sharon as their
prime minister. Small wonder that so few
people inhabiting the World Trade Center
towers, at least on the fateful morning of
September 11, had willingly identified
themselves as Israelis (in fact only
one of those thousands caught in the
upper, no-hope floors, to judge by the
latest statistics; other Israelis
had been warned in time). Which
makes it all the more puzzling to me, as
an outsider, that the two
visitors to San Lázaro, the
Mexican government's Chamber of Deputies
-- Pakistanis, to judge by the passports
found on them along with the guns,
grenades, and explosives in their
attaché cases -- should have
blurted out that they were actually
Israelis. In fact one of them claimed to be a
colonel in the Israeli secret service, no
less. That really is throwing dust in the
eyes of the authorities to an unnecessary
degree. What right-minded world citizen would
claim to be an Israeli right now, if his
passport establishes him as a Pakistani
(because heaven forefend that it was the
other way around)? It seems to have become something of a
fashion. Those five
young men tastelessly roaring with
laughter as they videoed the blazing Twin
Towers from various vantage points on the
Jersey Turnpike (they had box-cutters with
them, because they were after all
furniture packers): they too immediately
claimed to be Israelis, which only
resulted in their being deported to
Israel, after several weeks spent
languishing in prison. Come to think of it, those six other
gentlemen
travelling in three large white sedans
which were stopped by police in the
American mid-West, also carrying
box-cutters and other strange
paraphernalia, including sketch maps of
Florida nuclear power stations -- they
also were clearly of Middle Eastern
origin, according to the police (which was
why they were stopped); and yet they too
claimed to be Israelis, and produced
passports to support their claim.
Whereupon thease lucky folks were allowed
to vanish without trace.
ODD behaviour indeed. Did these folks not
realise that by claiming to be Israelis
they were exposing themselves to hatred
and vituperation on a villainous scale? To
anti-Semitism? Have they not read that the
world's most civilised governments, like
that in Berlin, have had to mobilise
police forces and pass special laws in an
attempt to stamp out these unreasonable
and monstrous hatreds? It is all a mystery to me, and I am
glad I have no cause to delve more deeply.
I sympathise wholeheartedly with Brent
Ashcroft in his task. If I were to create a new identity for
myself, an alter ego, it would not be as
an Israeli. It would be at the other end
of the humanitarian spectrum. I would make
out that I was a distant relative of
Mother Teresa, God rest her soul,
and that I was carrying out a secret
legacy for Albert Schweitzer, may
his bones rest in peace. I might even
claim to be purveying Christian Bibles to
the starved and under-privileged folks of
Afghanistan. Anything but an Israeli. Over the years I have always advised
that if somebody has an unfortunate name
-- we had a brave young
Bottom-Whettam at our school fifty
years ago -- he should change it not once,
but twice: first to Nelson, for
example, and then to Wellington
(just in case any inquirer should chance
to ask what his name was before). Equally, if I were to have been born an
Israeli, I would now be inclined to seek
first English, and then perhaps United
State citizenship, just in case anybody
should cotton on to the idea that I might
have originally come from the land of
Ariel Sharon, Menachem Begin, Binjamin
Netanyahu, Yitzhak Shamir, and
the rest of that unappetising gang. I am evidently not alone in having this
idea; this must surely be the very reason
why these latest misfits in Mexico City
and the mid-West had so many different
brands of passport concealed about their
persons. Or perhaps not. Only time will
show. Or perhaps not.
-
Previous
Radical's Diary
|