Few
non-writers can realize how easy
it is to fall foul of that
literary sin; plagiarism, like
the lazy cliché, is a
pitfall that lurks around the
corner for every long-term
writer. |
October
14, 2002 (Monday), London AN e-mail from Gary Redish, the
unpalatable Jewish lawyer in New Jersey,
who has been constantly sending me, for
two years or more, offensive hate e-mails,
then pleading with me not to post them as
they result in hate mail for himself. He
mentions that "your friend" Steven
Ambrose (picture below) died
early yesterday, Sunday; I am of course
sorry to hear that. Ambrose, a chain smoker, died of lung
cancer. I spent an afternoon with him
twenty-five years ago in Raleigh, when he
was an unknown professor of history
teaching at the University of North
Carolina and I was writing
on Dwight D Eisenhower, his primary
subject, and I found him very congenial.
He was a prolific writer who popularized
history, knew how to write, and was very
good television to watch. He had an easy
style and delivered his
pronunciamenti in a pleasing
Southern brogue. His
final months, even as the open grave
awaited him, were clouded over by bitter
allegations of plagiarism from his touchy
rivals and peers. Few non-writers can realize how easy it
is to fall foul of that literary sin;
plagiarism, like the lazy cliché,
is a pitfall that lurks around the corner
for every long-term writer. Two years
before, you laboriously copy down a
passage from a work that attracts or
inspires you for your own theme; two years
later, you find that handwritten note,
marvel at the prose you have written, read
back to yourself its polished,
ready-to-print style, and stitch it
effortlessly into your manuscript,
forgetting that it is not your own. Now come all the lesser rivals and
pronounce you a thief of their writings:
in fact they should be flattered that
their works have inspired you to the
labour of copying them down. How often have I just chuckled when I
see some BBC television programme, or some
book or newspaper article, lifting
passages, and even more often themes and
ideas and sheer research energy, from my
various books, without so much as a
citation to indicate who really did the
work. Sir
Ian Kershaw has admittedly
identified me as the source of some thirty
of the passages in his magisterial and
overly praised Hitler biography; but there
are many more, where he and I both know
who is the real author: O, frabjous day,
calloo, callay! Christopher Hitchens has also
spotted the same
surreptitious lifting of my work by recent
Churchill biographers, who dare not
however identify my books as their
quarry. Only yesterday in The Sunday
Telegraph I found myself reading three
lines, which I identified at once as
having come from the diary of Walther
Hewel, Joachim von Ribbentrop's
man on Adolf Hitler's staff. (One
of Hitler's closest confidants, Hewel
committed suicide a few hours after
Hitler). I
found those lines in a little black pocket
notebook, the 1941 private diary Hewel had
written, and I quoted them in Hitler's
War. It was pressed into my hand by
his widow Blanda, thirty years or more
ago; she had cherished until then the
faint hope that he might somehow have
survived -- I told her he had not, and put
her in touch with the doctor,
Hanns-Günther Schenk, who had
sat next to Walther in the bunker as he
put the pistol to his head. Walther
Hewel ( right) with Reinhard Heydrich and Julius Schaub (Hewel
Collection)
The second President of
the United States (unless I am mistaken),
was John Adams. He lived in London
on the north-eastern corner of
Grosvenor-square, just yards from the
house that was taken from me on May 23.
For thirty-four years I walked past the
plaque bearing his name each day. His son
John Quincy Adams once uttered
these fine words: America
goes not abroad in search of monsters
to destroy. She is the well wisher to
the freedom and independence of all.
She is the champion and vindicator only
of her own. She will recommend the
general cause by the countenance of her
voice, and the benignant sympathy of
her example.She
well knows that by once enlisting under
other banners than her own, were they
even the banners of foreign
independence, she would involve herself
beyond the power of extrication in all
the wars of interest and intrigue, of
individual avarice, envy and ambition,
which assume the colors and usurp the
standards of freedom. The fundamental
maxims of her policy would insensibly
change from liberty to force. I wonder if his present successor
believes Adams was mistaken?
TODAY'S London newspapers are full of
grisly photographs of the carnage caused
by a car bomb in Bali, killing two hundred
discotheque-goers, including many British
and American tourists. Indonesia's
president, Mrs Megawatti [where
DO they get these
names?] has until now refused to take
seriously Mr Bush's global "war on
terror". After pausing for a moment to reflect
upon which Intelligence service routinely
uses the car bomb as its weapon of choice
for mass destruction -- think M*ssad, as
it is unlikely to have involved the IRA
this time -- I soberly ponder the proper
question: Cui bono? Whom doth this outrage
profit in the long run? Somebody
sends me a hilarious photo, showing two
men making off in a white van: the men are
the illustrious leaders of the British and
American peoples, Mr Tony Milliwatti Blair
and Mr George W Milliwatti Bush
respectively, who have leapt onto the Bali
incident as further proof of the need for
their global war against the
al-Qaeda. [Previous
Radical's Diary] -
Stephen
Ambrose confesses to plagiarism |
2
Accuse Ambrose, Popular Conformist
Historian | Forbes
magazine agrees: he has done it
before
| and
gives more
examples
|