In
a letter to a friend in Italy, an
intercept of which I found in
Italian military Intelligence
archives, written a day or two
after the December 1936
abdication, King Edward VIII
referred cruelly to his luckless
brother George as Stuttering
Bertie.
--
David Irving |
April
5, 2002 (Friday) London I SPEND all morning slumped in front of
a sofa, wallowing in memories of the last
century as I watch on television the
ceremonial procession carrying the
Queen Mother's coffin from Clarence
House, her Royal standard being lowered as
it leaves the gates, to its lying-in-state
beneath the splendid hammer-beam oaken
roof at the thousand year old Westminster
Hall. I believe I saw her only once, as a boy
scout Cub, at a jamboree somewhere in east
Anglia. I think it must have been just
before the war ended, or just after. I was
too young to take it all in, younger than
Jessica is now; we all hid behind a
hummock until a signal was given when we
had to rush forward and greet Her Majesty.
It was all a very jolly occasion, and that
is the way she is now remembered. The broadcast media have now just begun
discreetly revealing the shadow side of
her late husband King George VI,
who died exactly fifty years ahead of her.
I was shocked to hear his guttural German
accent when he broadcast. Last night they
showed a newsreel clip, "suppressed at the
time," showing him stuttering himself into
total silence, as his brain failed to give
the necessary muscle impulses to the vocal
chords. In a letter to a friend in Italy, an
intercept of which I found in Italian
military Intelligence archives, written a
day or two after the December 1936
abdication, King Edward VIII
referred cruelly to his luckless brother
George as "Stuttering Bertie" (Bertie
being the family name for him.). Now that Elisabeth is gone, we may now
see what the public archives have to say
about that disgraceful episode -- how the
foreign office and Stanley Baldwin
hounded Edward out of office in 1936,
primarily because of his admiration for
the achievements of Hitler's Germany. Queen
Mum wanted peace with
Hitler -- The
Independent on Sunday, March
5, 2000 | The footnote, on page 853 of
Churchills War, vol. ii,
actually reads: "'The papers of
Sir Walter Monckton in the
Bodleian Library contain as items
23 and 24 correspondence with
Queen Elizabeth revealing
her desire to accept
Hitler's 1940 peace offer;
access to these items was
restricted until
Feb
2000." -- See Mr Irving's
Reader's
Letter to The
Spectator commenting on their
review
article on Churchill's War,
vol.ii. | The files of her principal legal adviser,
Walter Monckton, are housed in the
Bodleian Library at Oxford University: I
consulted them there, and found that one
file is resolutely closed -- his wartime
correspondence with Queen Elisabeth.
Leaked sources reveal that the file is
closed because it reveals that (like her
husband King George in 1940-41) she
despised Winston Churchill, whom
she viewed as the nemesis of her Empire;
and that she had strongly favoured
accepting the German peace offer when it
came in 1940.How improper of both of them! The
evidence of the king's feelings is in the
papers of Harry Hopkins, Mackenzie
King and others; the officially
published versions of the documents have
however been discreetly edited! (The
passages are in my Churchill's War, vol.
I). I wonder if that Monckton file will
now be opened, or will it contain the kind
of mysterious blank page inserts and
pagination gaps with which the more alert
Real Historians of WWII are infuriatingly
familiar.
I DECIDE to give the BBC another chance,
given its lapse of taste on the
announcement of her death a week ago --
their news-reader Peter Sissons was
asked to don a necktie in the BBC's new
standard livery of burgundy, rather than
the black tie which decency dictated. But today's commentator David
Dimbleby is only an inarticulate,
though well-spoken, shadow of his father
Richard: modern public figures (and
BBC commentators consider themselves as
such) have lost the art of rhetoric; their
vocabulary has shrunk to the width of a
staircase in some wretched mews flat in
Belgravia. Worse, they feel they must fill every
available silent space, oblivious of what
every graphic designer knows -- that the
white space on a page is often more
important than the words it surrounds.
Once, this morning, during a particularly
poignant picture, he felt obliged to say:
"And now silence reigns." Yes, David, it
did until you said that. Not that Richard Dimbleby was above the
occasional lapse. I recall his words as he
waited for Princess Margaret to
emerge from Westminster Abbey after her
first (as it proved, disastrous) marriage:
"And there," intoned Richard, "waiting
outside the great Abbey door, is the state
coach which is soon to be filled by the
figure of Princess Margaret." It would take a stern eye not to yield
the occasional tear at the solemn
spectacle of the thousands of young
marching servicemen, arms reversed, and
the gun carriage, and the sparkling
Koh-i-Noor diamond on Elizabeth's crown,
and the dissonant clash of the marching
bands as each new ones heaves into view,
and the wonderful drill of the naval
marching detachment, although their
hatbands showed them mostly to be from the
London shore establishments. Seeing the Scots Guards in their black
bearskins and scarlet tunics recalls to me
the day over forty years ago when I
visited "Butcher" Harris, Marshal of the
Royal Air Force Sir Arthur Harris, at his
home in Goring: he proudly showed off to
me, in a glass case the length of a wall,
his collection of lead soldiers portraying
the Queen's entire Coronation procession.
Now it is as though those lead soldiers
have come to life and are slow-marching
down the Mall, to the thump and blare of
military funeral music. Seeing these Royal Navy officers
marching with drawn swords suddenly brings
back to me a photo that hung during World
War II on my bedroom wall -- the plaster
was cracked from top to bottom by a V-1
flying-bomb that had hit a mile away: it
was a black-and-white photo of a naval
parade at "Pompey" -- Portsmouth to you
and me -- with a bearded naval officer
marching proudly with drawn sword a few
paces ahead of King George VI; the officer
was my father, whom I rarely saw -- he was
convoying supplies to the Russians and
haranguing factory workers in the
Midlands, at a time when certain others
were frantically burying their fortunes in
Swiss bank deposits, or fighting the
soldiers of the British Mandate in
Palestine. The photo, bound between two sheets of
glass with emerald-green passe-partout,
has long vanished except from my memory.
And now we are watching the solemn last
journey of that feckless monarch's
queen.
A FEW things do catch my attention about
today's crowds. As a court-certified
committed racist (i.e., native-born
Englishman), I notice that the crowds
captured by the television cameras,
standing ten or twenty deep in places, are
all White (as are, so far as I can see,
the marching British contingents); this is
unfortunate, as it seems to document the
emergence of two nations in this country
-- a White one, still observing the proper
decencies, displaying absolute loyalty to
their Crown; and an ethnic element, who
care less about any of these things
(assuming that the latest Home Office
statistics are correct) than about where
they can get or sell their next narcotic
joint, or snatch a handbag, or drive down
a high street with boom-box blaring
obscene and offensive lyrics through their
BMW's open windows. To be precise, as it is equally proper
to remark, the camera did linger briefly
on one aged coloured lady bent over the
railings, her face an impenetrable picture
of silent reflection -- I would judge that
she came from the Indian sub continent.
But that was all. The camera's eye also
picked up more than a couple of smirking,
gum-chewing, gawkers, whom I suspect to
have come from our former colonies. Yes, the camera often reveals the
unsuspected: particularly enjoyable the
glimpse of Tony Blair's crony, the
Lord Chancellor Derry Irvine, had
of the legal profession, wearing a robe
that appeared to have been crafted in Gold
by the same people who made his expensive
wallpaper: As all other heads bowed in
prayer, his head remained erect, his
little piggy eyes darting furtively around
the Hall, now here, now there. There was also one sad, perhaps even
disrespectful, novelty: in my youth, the
policemen lining the route would have been
wearing ceremonial police uniforms, facing
the procession, and saluting their
monarch. Even in Hitler's Germany, which
was as every schoolboy is taught one of
the most hated regimes in all history, the
police faced the parade as the leaders
drove past in their open Mercedes
limousines. Now the police face the
crowds, giving their backs to the monarchy
as they are driven past in closed, bullet
proof Rolls-Royces. One or two other things: Was the
presence today of so many armed British
policemen, strutting across the roadway
with their Heckler & Koch's, really
necessary on such an occasion? Did the sad
procession of cars back to the palace have
to be preceded by a solitary police
motorcyclist, blue-lights blinking, like
the man with the red lamp who used to walk
ahead of trains? Was it really necessary
for four mounted Metropolitan Police to
precede the entire ceremonial
procession? To the horror, I suspect, of the
present burgundy-flavoured regime at the
BBC, as the ceremonial ended these British
crowds burst into a loud, spontaneous,
uncontrolled applause, which rippled along
Whitehall, across Horseguards Parade and
down the Mall, as the people caught sight
of our present Queen being driven back to
the palace with her husband Prince
Philip (four of whose sisters were in
Germany throughout World War II, married
to gauleiters, SS generals, Hermann
Göring's signals Intelligence
chief, and the like). No doubt these unrehearsed sounds of
loyal admiration will be edited out, and a
few cheering Black faces digitally edited
into the crowds, using the same techniques
that Warner Brothers used to put a few
Black children belatedly into the
all-White crowd scenes in the Harry
Potter movie. This will help to create
the image of a united, homogeneous,
happy-go-lucky Britain that Tony Blair's
BBC would like to project. [Previous
Radical's
Diary]-
|