September 14, 2000Untold Stories Joseph Sobran A JUSTICE Department study finds that
nearly 80 per cent of the inmates scheduled for the death
penalty in federal prisons are non-white. Is anyone really
surprised? The Washington Post reports: "Attorney General Janet Reno said she was
troubled by the findings of racial disparity, noting that
crime is often the product of social ills that
disproportionately affect minorities." After reading a sentence like that, I'm struck by the
thought that the reason Miss Reno isn't married may be that
she never met Ramsey Clark. They were made for each
other. Clark, you may recall, was Lyndon Johnson's
attorney general in the mad Sixties. He saw every criminal
as a victim of society. He not only wanted an end to the
death penalty, he thought no prisoner should serve more than
five years for any crime. In his book, poverty and racism
explained everything, and to understand all was to forgive
all. Clark has a worthy successor in Miss Reno. Before we adopt the view that "minorities" dominate death
row through no fault of their own, we should inquire whether
they commit more violent crimes than whites. FBI statistics
have found that this is indeed the case with respect to
interracial crimes: blacks commit far more violent crimes
against whites than whites commit against blacks, by a ratio
of more than 40 to 1. Such crimes are apt to be crimes
against strangers, rather than crimes of passion. Whites know this without reading statistics. A white
crime against a black is apt to receive national publicity
as evidence of "racism." Black crimes against whites are
hushed up -- even when the motive is nakedly racial. In April a black man, yelling racial epithets, slashed
the throat of an eight-year-old white child in Alexandria,
Virginia. The dead boy was a total stranger. It later
transpired that the police had found a note in the killer's
room reading, "Kill them racess whiatt kidds anyway"
(spelling in original). Here was the very model of a "hate crime": killing a
child at random solely because of his race. But the police
and the media played down the racial angle. Janet Reno
didn't call and Bill Clinton didn't give any sermons
on how the things that unite us are more important than the
things that divide us. You had to follow the story for weeks
and read between the lines in order to get the drift, until
the details finally leaked out. In Cleveland recently, a friend of mine -- a white woman
with an eight- year-old son -- was sitting at a Denny's
restaurant waiting for a table. A black woman wanted her to
move. She declined. The black woman released a torrent of
epithets -- "white trash," "white bitch," and worse.
Eventually my friend left in disgust, feeling she couldn't
win. Several other whites, waiting for their own tables,
witnessed the incident; it's a safe bet that they won't go
back to that Denny's again. My friend -- Ann, as I'll call her -- having lived in a
racially mixed neighborhood, has often had similar
experiences. The general rule in such situations is that
when blacks attack, whites retreat. Blacks make no bones
about their racial feelings; whites have learned to suppress
their feelings, though they get blamed anyway. Ann wound up telling her story to a lawyer from Denny's.
Having lost a costly suit for a single allegation of "racial
discrimination" a few years ago, Denny's is very nervous
about such incidents. Ann was nervous too; though she was in
fact the victim of racial insults, she feared that the
government might somehow get involved and blame her. She has
never heard of Janet Reno taking the side of white people,
except for Bill Clinton and Fidel Castro. Then there is her son. At age eight he has learned to
expect to be bullied and ganged up on by black kids; now he
has seen his mother grossly insulted by a black woman. His
racial attitudes aren't being shaped by David Duke
and the Ku Klux Klan; they are being formed by his own fear,
humiliation, and misery. When he's a little older liberals
will lecture him on the need for tolerance. |