Unless correspondents ask us not to, this Website will post selected letters that it receives and invite open debate.
Scandinavian Friend writes
on August 8, 1998 this scathing commentary on the
kaleidoscope of killing methods allegedly used during the
Holocaust -- and how the established historians have
gradually abandoned each allegation in
Re: Belzec Item in your last Action Report:
I AM VERY relieved that the Jewish community have agreed to only one solution for above camp: gassing with CO2. They have now dismissed the seven other ways by which the Jews earlier claimed the Jews were killed in this camp:
But we all know that Mr. Gerstein was a liar . . .
Comments on the above are welcomed, from both sides of the debate.
Another reader, D.D., writes:
IF I WERE a mass murderer, I would have given them poisoned drink or food, and then let them carry along in the box cars. That way there would have been no danger with gas seepage and no danger handling the bodies. Any left alive (i.e. who did not drink the poisoned water or whatever) could be shot.
Mass gassings with hydrogen cyanide don't make sense, the bodies are dangerous to handle, and special rooms and precautions are required.
What are the population stats, I mean how many people lived in Europe that cannot be accounted for by normal war death means ? I think that would answer the question better than anything.
I am begining to become convinced that something is wrong with the story, but the reaction of people around me is so extreme (they automatically think you are a Hitler-worshipper or something equally daft) that I almost wish I had not started studying it. -- D.D.